Co-authors of the destruction of American power

In his new 464 page book “Reappraisals: Reflections on the Forgotten Twentieth Century‘, the ubiquitous and prolific Tony Judt says:” Both liberal and neocon thinking has suffered from an ingrained provincialism that, when combined with grandiose schemes for rebuilding the world on the American model, helped to precipitate the foreign policy disasters of the Bush era”.   Thinking of the Cold War in narrow Americanocentric terms, neocons along with most liberals, never paused to examine the origins of that conflict, which go back to the beginnings of the Soviet regime. The upshot has been the destruction of Iraq and an accelerating decline in American power.

Judt is hard on the liberal hawks, who “display precisely the same mix of dogmatic faith and cultural provincialism, not to mention enthusiasm for violent political transformation at other people’s expense“. He is talking about such people as Michael Ignatieff and Paul Berman, “useful idiots” who connive in the war on terror. Neocons generate brutish policies and liberal hawks provide the fig leaves. He is hard on the New York Times and the Washington Post, who legitimized the war, and ascribes the calamities as arising from “ nostalgia for the comforting verities of a simpler time and a desire for a sense of purpose“.

Others might say that these Americans desperately need an enemy , any enemy, or they would otherwise have to concentrate on the boring deficiencies in their own domestic policy that so few want to seriously debate or address. Relief! They have discovered Islamofascism. Just in time!


  1. It’s a commentary on the power of the right-wing media monopolies that the Republican candidate (the candidate for the defense industry) is only four points behind Obama. People in the hinterland do not get a balanced view of foreign and military policy and still think you can “win” in Iraq, not to mention Afghanistan. The provincialism is astonishing.

  2. HI Robert and all,

    Yep. It’s amazing how ‘Islamofascism’ has replaced the old threat of Communism here.

    Actually, it was something I was afraid of, when the Soviet Union collapsed, and China went capitalist. What new bogeyman would they come up with? I know the commies were the source of much fear-mongering and income for the Military-Industrial Complex. I was hoping that we would enter a new era of peace and prosperity here. but the ‘election’ of George W. Bush dashed those hopes. 🙁

    Epicureanism, with it’s emphesis on withdrawal and tending ones own garden seemed just the thing under these circumstances.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.