Religious intolerance

An 8-year-old Oklahoma girl has been expelled from school for telling another girl she had a crush on her. Delanie Shelton says officials at the Rejoice Christian Schools told her daughter Chloe that just expressing same-sex attraction was a violation of the Bible.  

Shelton said Chloe had been “ripped away” from teachers and friends, and asked, “Does God still love me?” (The Week)

My comment:  I only had sons and am woefully ignorant about bringing up little girls.  But isn’t having crushes on other girls a right of passage for many ( presumably not all) young girls and a normal part of growing up?  And if a child does reach adulthood more attracted to women rather than men, so what?   The Rejoice Christian school is mis-named, and expelling an 8 year old a shocking example of narrow- mindedness.

Ahead of the queue

Remember how, at the beginning of the pandemic, everyone used to chirp “we’re all in this together!”? You don’t hear much of that any more because it’s embarrassingly obvious we’re not. Watching wealthy people, who have the means to shield from the virus, being vaccinated before many essential workers is infuriating. Even worse is the fact that there’s not much we can do about it. Making it harder to get a vaccine helps no one: better a few undeserving people slip through the net than a single precious vaccine goes to waste.

As for shaming the vaccine queue-hoppers, numerous studies show the “upper class” are more likely to lack empathy and engage in unethical behaviour. In one example, researchers put a jar of sweets in front of people and attached a note stating the candy was to be taken to a child-research laboratory. Participants who thought of themselves as wealthy took twice as many sweets as those who thought of themselves as poor.

As experts keep telling us, no one is safe until we’re all safe.  How many highly contagious mutant viruses is it going to take for the wealthy world to realise that? I really don’t want to find out.  (Arwa Mahdawi , The Guardian).

My comment:  The rich live beneath the radar, that is, they don’t advertise their habits and attitudes.  On the other hand the people who idolize the former President proudly parade around without masks, ignore health warnings, minimize the dangers of Covid 19, and politícize every attempt to eliminate the threat they pose to other people. Are you thinking what I’m thinking?  Yes!  These are the people who generally go to church every week.  That Jesus would have preached fiercely against their behavior is ( in my opinion) a given.  Hypocrisies rules!

 

Electric cars

500,000.  This is the number of electric battery – powered cars sold in Europe in 2020, a year on year increase of about 40%, and a milestone in the industry’s move away from fossil fuels.

My comment:  Of course electric batteries and charging points have other snags for the environment – the electricity has to come from somewhere.  But at least it’s a huge improvement on gasoline.

The benefits of a daily bath

An article in PopularScience.com by Rachel Feltman claims that adults who soak in a bathtub regularly are less stressed, depressed and prone to anger than those who only take showers.  Furthermore baths improve circulation and improve sleep.

To enjoy optimum sleep benefits you should have a bath 60 to 220 minutes before bedtime, in water only pleasantly warm, not too hot.  The warm water boosts blood circulation to hands and feet, which in turn kick-starts the cooling of the body’s core that naturally occurs during sleep. A bath puts your body on the right trajectory, “cuing your brain to chill out and let you sleep”.

My take: Yes, fine, but I don’t think baths can have much effect on depression.  Stopping watching the political news on television would do the job quicker.

The British voted for more bureaucracy – and got it in spades.

Almost three-quarters of British manufacturers are struggling to cope with delays in moving goods in and out of the EU due to Brexit and the coronavirus pandemic, a trade survey has revealed. Two months after the UK left the EU, 74% of firms said they are facing delays with EU imports and exports due to mounting frd tape , customs checks and disruption to global trade, research from the manufacturing trade group Make UK found. One boss said Brexit has “created a lot of extra bureaucracy that just wasn’t there before”, while another added: “Eventually we manage to get the goods over, but it just takes a lot longer.   (The Week, 11 Mar 2021).

My comment:  WhT did they expect?

Plastic bags and sealife

Plastic bags and flexible packaging are the deadliest plastic items in the ocean, killing wildlife around the globe.  Discarded fishing line and nets, as well as latex gloves and balloons were also found to be disproportionately lethal.  Ingesting plastic was responsible for killing animals across 80 species..

The review, published in the journal Conservation Letters, analysed 655scientific articles about marine debris and found 79 studies across all inhabited continents detailing deaths of whales and dolphins, seals and sea lions, sea turtles and sea birds.  (CSIRO, Australian government science agency)

My comment: it would be interesting to know how this detritus gets into the sea in the first place.  Cruise ships come to mind as the worst offenders.  An analysis in 2021 , when cruise ships are laid up, might give an indication by showing whether ocean rubbish has grown or diminished during Covid-19.

An afterlife?

There is no afterlife, no throne in the sky, no choirs or angels.  But the afterlife that is a reality is also reassuring.  As collections of atoms your body is re-cycled into Nature, where parts are re-incorporated into birds, fishes, trees or flowers.  You are immortal!  But in an ever-changing way.  The process can take many decades or centuries, but is assured.  Your reputation may be world-wide or your life may be obscure, but in Nature we are all equal and our corporeal bodies, including our souls, will become part of the glory that is the natural world.

My comment:  Beats doing nothing on a cloud, just listening  to the same hymns to glory every day for eternity.

A touching story

When a TSA officer at Portland International Airport was called over to translate for a Spanish-speaking family, he learned that they had been stuck in the airport overnight. The family had intended to travel to Portland, Maine, but a travel agent booked them a flight to Portland, Ore.

Officer Martin Rios escorted the family to the ticketing desk and found that they had just $200, not enough to fly across the country. Rios paid for the tickets out of his own pocket and sent the family on their way. “I just know that I didn’t really have it in me to turn them away,” he said.

  No comment needed.

What is the point of Facebook?

When it was started Facebook served a useful social service in allowing families and friends to keep up with the people dear to them.  So far so good.  We all know people for whom Facebook is an important part of their lives.  These people far outnumber the wreckers, trouble-makers, haters and liars.

Recently, however,  Facebook and other “social” networks have been adopted by the latter, spreading baseless lies without a shred of evidence and undermining social cohesion and democracy.

The problem is that those baseless lies are uncritically believed by millions (12 million to be fairly precise) who don’t require anything to be true, just that the content suits their skewed world outlook. Result:  the violent insurrection at the U.S. Capitol, which finally moved Facebook to ban the most egregious of liars for disinformation, abuse, and hate speech.

Facebook has created a new Oversight Board, accountable only to Mark Zuckerberg, not the public, that will review decisions on who to ban and for how long. That means that Facebook will still be unaccountable to the public.  It already has rules against sharing inaccurate voting information, spreading election disinformation, and incitement to violence  — it needs to enforce them, reverse the policy of not fact-checking political ads, and immediately close the loopholes that far-right militias exploited to organize  insurrection on Facebook in plain sight.

If Facebook doesn’t listen to the law- abiding and sane and start enforcing its own civic integrity policies, it will need government  action to  protect our democracy and hold them accountable.

My own view, for what it’s worth, is that Facebook et al does more harm than good in any case (see stories about unhappy teenagers), and ought never have been invented, along with other socially undermining things on the internet. But then I suppose I do believe in free speech.  I was just to naive to believe that it couldn’t do so much harm.

Brexit again: London finance companies moving assets to EU

City firms revealed in the final months of 2020 that they planned to shift nearly £100bn in assets to the EU, taking the total value of assets lost to the bloc since the Brexit vote to £1.3 trillion, according to a new survey.

The data from consulting group EY pointed to a last-minute push by firms before 31 December, after the UK-EU trade deal did not offer concessions for the UK’s dominant financial services sector. It forced companies to move staff and assets to the continent in order to continue serving EU customers.

According to EY’s latest Brexit tracker, which covered the period from October 2020 to February, firms have shifted or declared plans to move approximately £500bn worth of those assets in the last two years alone.  (Kalyeena Makortoff, EY, March 1, 2031)

My comment: My oldest son works for a big international bank.  He tells me that large numbers of City workers are moving to Frankfurt or Paris and that the loss of financial services is going to be catastrophic for the UK.  One of the side effects is that the expensive and fancy office accommodation in the City is emptying, leaving a huge hole in the viability of corporations who own the tower blocks. Then there is the effect on the value of residential property in London, as bankers move to the Continent.  And these example of the effects of Brexit are only a start.

Do Brexiteers  care?  Well, many are elderly, living in in the boondocks or countrified spots, (but also in the past!)  When they find their pensions are dodgy because of the effects of Brexit on the economy, just listen to the uproar!

P.S: To those for whom this issue concerns a far- away country of which they know little – I will not go on about this issue.  Nonetheless, the UK is arguably America’s most supportive and active ally.  It does have (as yet unclear) effects on the United States.

Mourning Brexit

“It is frustrating for remainers ( anti-Brexiteers) who still crave a moment of vindication, when the fraud is proved beyond doubt and the tide of opinion turns. But for that to happen, Brexit would have to be measured in terms of trade and diplomacy. Those aren’t the leavers’ metrics. They long ago swapped economic argument for culture war bluster.

“There is no defence of Johnson’s deal if the ambition was serious advancement of the national interest. But there is another test. It is the one that matters most to the architects of Brexit, although they never admit it, even to themselves.

“For the true believers in Brexit, a good Brexit is one that keeps the grievance alive; that makes foreigners the scapegoat for bad government; that continues to indulge the twin national myths of victimhood and heroic defiance. Measured for that purpose, Johnson’s pointless Brexit is perfect.”  ( Part of a long article by Rafael Behr, The Guardian , 24 Feb 2021)

My comment:  How right!  And how shameful!  To my chagrin some British friends , and even relatives, support Brexit, and I have had to listen politely to their views, squirming.  There was nothing better to ruin a nice dinner party than to gainsay the Brexiteers, and now I will have to restrain myself from “ I told you so” comments to keep the family peace; indeed to keep friends.

As an historian one starts with the Roman invasion and then follow the fortunes of Britannia through to the 21st Century.  From an obscure offshore island through the centuries back to an obscure island once again!  Makes you sad.

Following Epicurus one should ignore politics, but it’s hard not to be attentive when disasters like this happen on your watch.  This is existential.

Can the US mend and reassert itself?

Watching the opening weeks of the Biden administration are Europeans filled with relief and optimism? Not exactly. Four years of Trump has, it seems, battered our trust, convincing us that Joe Biden, liked as he is, can’t fix a “broken” America, that the US is an unreliable ally, and that within a decade China will be the global superpower.   (The Guardian)

My comment:   That China will soon be the global superpower is not in doubt, (and it is not a pleasant prospect).  But in my opinion, if Biden cannot calm the Capitol  thugs and the populists, reduce the corruption and address some of the other problems besetting the US, then arguably no one can do it. He is smart, and has surrounded himself with capable people. The last few months has made me personally very anxious, and maybe the reader feels the me way? But a watchful ataraxia should break out!

 

The Dinner Gift, two short verses*

 Do you remember last time what we took?

A crime DVD or that Middle East book?

We’ve given them flowers and the odd potted plant,

And that re-cycled candle that came from your aunt.

And didn’t we bring back some French confiture?

Perhaps that would do? Or the blackberry liqueur?

But hang on a moment, temper my zeal;

They brought that last time they came for a meal.

 

A cheese, I am certain, would go down quite well.

Unless they’re intent on a low LDL.

A box of good chocolates is fine to donate, 

Except that I know they are watching their weight.

What can we take without causing disquiet

For people who live on a permanent diet?

Oh, for a gift that is not anodyne!

We’ll just have to take them a bottle of wine.

  •  by Robert Hanrott

 My comment:  It will be nice to have the problem once again!  How often have you dined with friends recently?

Extremists and their views

People with extremist views are less able to do complex tasks. The Cambridge University team say their findings could be used to spot people at risk from radicalisation:

The Cambridge researchers sought to evaluate whether cognitive disposition – differences in how information is perceived and processed – sculpts ideological world-views such as political, nationalistic and dogmatic beliefs, beyond the impact of traditional demographic factors like age, race and gender.

The study, built on previous research, included more than 330 US-based participants aged 22 to 63 who were exposed to a battery of tests – 37 neuropsychological tasks and 22 personality surveys – over two weeks.

Overall, the researchers found that ideological attitudes mirrored cognitive decision-making.  A key finding was that people with extremist attitudes tended to think about the world in black and white terms, and struggled with complex tasks that required intricate mental steps.

“Individuals or brains that struggle to process and plan complex action sequences may be more drawn to extreme ideologies, or authoritarian ideologies that simplify the world,” the author said.

Those with tendencies towards extremism are not good at regulating their emotions, meaning they were impulsive and tended to seek out emotionally evocative experiences. This helps us understand what kind of individual might be willing to commit violence against innocent others.

Participants who are prone to dogmatism – stuck in their ways and relatively resistant to credible evidence – actually have a problem with processing evidence even at a perceptual level, the authors found.

“It’s fascinating, because conservatism is almost a synonym for caution,” the author said. “We’re seeing that – at the very basic neuropsychological level – individuals who are politically conservative … treat every stimulus  they encounter with caution.”The “psychological signature” for extremism across the board was a blend of conservative and dogmatic psychologies.

The study, which looked at 16 different ideological orientations, could have profound implications for identifying and supporting people most vulnerable to radicalisation across the political and religious spectrum.

The team found that demographics don’t explain a whole lot; they only explain roughly 8% of the variance,  “Whereas, actually, when we incorporate these cognitive and personality assessments as well, suddenly, our capacity to explain the variance of these ideological world-views jumps to 30% or 40%.

(Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, Natalie Grover,  and Dr Leor Zmigrod at Cambridge’s department of psychology. 21/ 02/ 2021)

My take: Interesting though this is, the results are on display every day of the week, and have been on full view since the election. Once an untruth is told repeatedly and without evidence it seems to be believed with furious certainty, regardless of how many respectable people gainsay it. Nothing shakes it.  It is difficult to run a successful democracy once the number of these people is significant.  Those who follow Epicurus should be able to ignore all this, but as so many Germans and Italians found in the 1920s and 30’s, one’s life is potentially at stake if you do.