Technology reducing ataraxia.

For days I was wrestling with a recalcitrant email system.  Emails refused to depart from my computer, and I could find no one who understood even how the system works, let alone correct it.  I paid a silly amount to someone purporting to be an expert, but it turned out he wasn’t .

So let me be an epicurean philosopher for a moment and ask the question, “Why are we doing all this technology to ourselves?  What is the point, except to illustrate that collectively we can do it, and someone, somewhere is making a pile of money at it?”

Apparently, 5G, a system that is going to take over the world, is going to allow you (yes!) to connect your electric kettle to the internet. Nothing will be isolated. Big Brother can surveil electronically in real time how many slices of bread you are toasting for breakfast.  Why?  Don’t ask!

There are lots of us increasingly feeble old people, and few can understand computers or electronics.  Wait till the 20s/30s crowd, who are foisting all this technology upon us,  reach old age – because they will.  By  that time it will be too late. They will be getting confused, forgetful and stressed – and will have done it to themselves.  But I suppose the imaginations of these techies doesn’t run to imaging themselves old and feeling helpless.  If the greatest threat to us all is  the climate crisis, the second is the complexity and ubiquity of technology, which frequently doesn’t work, and no one seems to know why.  Wait till it happens to you – and repent!

This an an epicurean blog.  We believe in a happy, contented life with peace of mind.  I fear it is all going wrong!!

The crisis among conservatives

“In Britain and the US a deep crisis of conservatism has been building since the end of the Reagan and Thatcher governments. It is a crisis of competence, of intellectual energy and coherence, of electoral effectiveness, and – perhaps most serious of all – of social relevance.”.  (The Guardian, 28 May 2019).

If this is true conservatives haven’t noticed it.  They still cling to the idea that, if you keep cutting government services and help to the sick and poor, and you pass on the savings to the rich and to big companies in the form of tax cuts, “all boats will be raised”.  This tripe has been disproved repeatedly.  What this policy (their only policy?) does is to allow companies to  buy back their shares, a particularly useless waste of money, enhancing  the wealth of a small minority, ensuring the financial support of the very rich, and delighting the authorities in Panama and other money sinks.  The old idea of government was to pay attention to all citizens, rich and poor. Remember that?

Those who espouse Epicurean principles are not supposed to dwell on politics. That was all well and good when government was small and barely impinged on daily life. Now what governments do has a real, daily effect on the citizenry.   The likelihood that Boris Johnson will be the next British Prime Minister must seem incomprehensible to the rest of the world. Regrettably., it could mean a general election and the distant prospect on an equally incompetent and out-of-touch Labour Party assuming office.  Either way, bye-bye Britain as a functioning, respected country the rest of the world can do business with. In the scale of history, all this will pass; but whether it passes in our lifetimes is a matter for conjecture.

 

 

 

Cold water fish move North

My wife and I went mackerel fishing off the coast of Dorset, in Southern England. There were about 15 people on the boat, the weather was glorious and the catch quite good, enough for everyone.  We had fresh, baked mackerel for dinner that evening, caught on the end of a line.

I got talking to the owner of the boat, who told me that, this size of catch was now getting unusual. In the whole month of April he and his fellow fishermen had caught only 7 (yes, 7) mackerel.  He told me that the mackerel shoals were abandoning British waters and were moving North as result of the warming of the Channel waters.  If you want to fish for mackerel now, he told me, you have to go to the seas around Iceland to find the sort of numbers you used to get.

I wish Mr.“global climate change is all a hoax”Trump and his his fellow climate deniers could have heard these comments. What preposterous explanation would they have offered this fisherman for his calamitously falling catches.  The warming seas must be hurting him seriously., and his future as a professional fisherman looks scary.  All over the planet real people are having their lives and livings threatened, and Trump is boosting oil and gas production  and scrapping rules that mitigate the effects of a warming planet.  He will not be hurt, but his children and grandchildren certainly will be. He doesn’t care.  Epicurus distrusted politicians, justifiably – little has changed in that respect.

Dementia misdiagnosed

Hundreds of thousands of older people who have been diagnosed with Alzheimer’s may, in fact, be suffering from a different disease.   According to new research, the condition, known as Late, affects a fifth of people over 85. Like Alzheimer’s, Late leads to memory loss, cognitive decline and mood disorders (although its progress tends to be slower). The disease’s neurology, however, is very different: rather than deposits of sticky amyloid plaques and tau proteins, the brains of Late sufferers contain a misshapen form of a different protein, TDP-43. “Those who work on dementia have long been puzzled by patients who have all the symptoms of Alzheimer’s disease, but whose brains do not contain the pathological features of the condition,” says Professor Robert Howard of University College London. “We now know that these puzzling patients are probably suffering from Late”. The authors of the study say Late’s discovery could help explain why attempts to find a treatment for Alzheimer’s haven’t been more successful. Trials of drugs based on clearing out amyloid plaques have probably included significant numbers of participants who had Late, and not Alzheimer’s – which would have skewed the results.   (The Times and The Week, 11 May 2019)

For those “late” in life memory loss and confusion are particularly scary.  Recently, trying to resurrect a TV streaming system I hadn’t used for months,  I stood there without a solitary  idea as to how to set about it – what to plug into what or the baffling sequence of buttons to press on the two quite different TV gizmos.  Rescued by a clever wife we got the system working.  I mention this not only to praise a wife with a memory, but to protest about the complexity of everything we have to do these days, and the wide gap between people like me and the young people who write the instructions, for whom this stuff is as simple as eating breakfast.  A big “thank you” to scientists and medical researchers. Your work is so often disrespected on social media, but I, for one, am glad you are out there.

 

”I Did it All Myself” – the cry of the very rich

I did it all myself.

For sure, I did it all myself.

I never used networks or old college friends

On whom the success of so many depends.

I went out to work at the age of eighteen

Thin as a rake, but determined and lean,

And I laid rows of bricks and mixed tons of cement,

Made ten bucks a day for my food and my rent.

Twelve hours with no break did I labor on site,

And I did my book-learning by candle at night.

Then one day the boss man said, “Hey, come here, kid,

I’ve been watching you, boy, and I like what you did.

You’ve got brains, you work hard, but your problem is knowledge.”

So I chucked it and went to community college.

I learned my house building from sewer to gable,

And earned extra money by waiting on table.

Then I built up a  company, just as I’d planned,

Scouring the country, developing land.

I have been real successful, the business has grown,

And I’ve ten million bucks that I’ve made on my own.

I’d have made twice as much and could maybe relax

If it wasn’t for government, liberals and tax,

The planners, the lawyers, the dumb regulations,

Activist judges, red-tape strangulations;

The NIMBYSwho get up a great caterwaul

When you build on a green field a new shopping mall.

It’s always the do-gooding, meddling few

Who complain at the loss of some trees or a view.

No, all the restrictions should now be relaxed

And government prohibitions be axed.

We don’t need these laws, they all need up-ending,

And let’s call a halt to all government spending.

Send bureaucrats off up to Mars in a rocket,

But stop pilfering profit from my hard-earned pocket.

Sack all pen-pushers, ignore stupid rules

Made for the work-shy and drawn up by fools.

The need for it’s gone, it is all over-blown.

After all, what I’ve done, I have done on my own.

………..Truth replies

Are you telling me your parents had nothing to do

With the bundle of talents and hang-ups that’s you?

Where is the mention of school on your part,

That taught you the culture and gave you a start?

You must owe a debt to some of your teachers,

Those lousily paid and unrecognized creatures.

Who established the college you studied at later?

It wasn’t the wages you earned as a waiter.

Who paid for the roads that we all take for granted?

Our whole infrastructure was not simply planted,

But grew from decades of investment, and sacks

Of public subventions you now spurn as “tax”.

What is the value you put upon peace,

Containment of crime and the role of police?

Who bought your houses, your suburban sprawls,

Your gas stations, offices, car parks and malls?

Why, government workers, contractors and such

And similar folk whom you now hate so much.

The fortune Five Hundred fattens and waxes

On recycled money from Federal taxes;

Directly or not, here’s a thought to astound:

You probably shared in this merry-go-round!

Who laid the ground rules that draw to this nation

Immigrants swelling a huge population,

All needing housing?  These guys you can thank

For increasing your profits and cash in your bank.

Have you had no advantage from new medication?

Half the research is paid from taxation.

Have you had no advantage from rules about drugs,

Or water we drink, free of threatening bugs?

I bet were you sick I would hear through your sobs

“Wish they’d get a grip and start doing their jobs.”

Scrap Social Security?  Wow, you are plucky,

But perhaps, just like you, everyone will get lucky,

The market might rise and its rise might not vary,

Believe that? Believe in the good Christmas Fairy!

Thank God for the people who faithfully strive

To frame equal rules which have let business thrive,

Where corruption is modest, the playing field fair

And the whole business culture’s not governed by fear.

You’d have a real reason to grumble and moan

If you had to do business in Sierra Leone.

No, none of us prosper alone, I would say.

A little humility goes a long way.

( From a book of light verse called “ The;Rueful Hippopotamus” by Robert Hanrott, available on Amazon)

A “vicious cycle” in energy use

Extreme weather is commonly seen as a product of climate change. But it is also becoming a significant driver of the crisis, a new report suggests. In its annual review of global energy trends, BP calculates that global demand for energy grew by 2.9% last year – the biggest rise since 2010 – and that a significant factor in this was the number of much colder and hotter days than normal, which led to a greater use of air conditioners, fans and heaters.

As a result of this additional energy usage, carbon emissions rose by 2% – faster than in any year since 2011, and roughly the carbon equivalent of having 400 million more cars on the roads. Spencer Dale, BP’s chief economist, warned of a “worrying vicious cycle: increasing levels of carbon emissions leading to more extreme weather patterns, which in turn trigger stronger growth in energy and carbon emissions”.

While the report acknowledges the “extraordinary growth” in renewable energy – up 14.5% last year – it argues that to tackle climate change we must also find ways of making fossil fuels, BP’s product, less damaging. The oil and gas multinational has called for countries to switch from coal-generated power to gas (which produces fewer emissions), and for more government investment in carbon capture technology, to eliminate the emissions from the flues of power plants before they reach the air. (The Week, 22 June 2019).

Did I read this correctly?  One of the big fossil fuel producers, BP, which has fought the idea that its product is responsible for global climate change with every means in its power, now wants greater use of the very natural gas it now produces ( of course) and wants us, the public, to invest in carbon capture from power plants to make its own product harmless.  Excuse me – but they produce the product that results in the emissions; they should pay for the carbon capture, big time.  Talk about shameless cheek!

CEO pay

Iger: too much reward for too little risk?

“Something is rotten in the magic kingdom.” That’s how Abigail Disney, great-niece of Walt, viewed the pay award of $65.6m (£50m) to Disney’s boss, Bob Iger. “Naked indecency”, she called it. Not that she felt he didn’t merit a bonus for his management skill; it was the size of his reward she objected to. And she’s right.   Chief executive pay, here and in the US, has become divorced from any balance between risk and reward. Walt Disney, an artistic and business genius, built an entertainment empire from scratch and stood to lose everything if it failed. “Iger, when all’s said and done, is an employee whose great rewards were never balanced by personal risk.” When he and other CEOs get obscene windfalls, it makes capitalism stink; it plays into the hands of our “avowedly Marxist” shadow chancellor, John McDonnell, who plans to expropriate ordinary shareholders in big companies by handing 10% of their investments to employees. Businesses that fail to exercise proper judgement over bosses’ pay should beware. They “will themselves be judged, and not to their advantage”.  (Dominic Lawson,  The Sunday Times, The Week 4 May 2019)

Moderation is the keyword of Epicureanism, and such barefaced greed is immoderate.  Perhaps there should be a general rule – unless fifty percent, or over, of shareholders vote at annual general meetings (or at least fill in the absentee ballots sent them) no changes of Board personnel or its pay can take effect?  No doubt some will cheat and cook the books, but in due course they will find themselves looking for new jobs.  The shareholder-Board relationship is moribund, dominated by big, faceless investors and pension companies, who conduct their own businesses in likewise undemocratic ways and pay little attention to the underlying health of the enterprises they invest in  Company boards, meanwhile,  care not a jot for their shareholders or public perception.

Sent from my iPad

Good news – A quick scan for prostate cancer

A new non-invasive MRI scan for prostate cancer could “revolutionise” diagnosis of the disease, scientists have claimed. Men in the UK aren’t screened for prostate cancer because the existing blood test – which looks for raised levels of the protein PSA – is unreliable. Most men with raised PSA levels don’t have cancer, but must have an invasive biopsy to establish this; the test misses around 10% of tumours; and it cannot distinguish slow-growing ones that don’t need treatment from the most aggressive kinds. The developers of the new ten-minute scan, which is being tested on 350 men this summer, claim it produces fewer “false positives” and can detect if the cancer is one that requires immediate treatment. Prof Mark Emberton, Dean of the UCL faculty of Medical Science, and one of the scientists trialling the test, said he hoped that the NHS would eventually adopt it as a routine screening tool.  (The Week, 22 June 2019)

This is very personal to me.  As far as I can establish every male among my ancestors for over two or three centuries appear to have died of prostate cancer, including (definitely) my father and grandfather.  It is a genetic inheritance, and I am the first to survive it, thanks to a good surgeon and modern medicine. It is, in my family’s case, diagnosed within the first six months of the 60th year – reliable as a clock.  But the biopsies are literally hit or miss, and I was told that the cancer is usuallh more aggressive in reality than the biopsies indicate.  This news gives me Epicurean peace of mind.  I have two sons, and it is reassuring to know about this advance in detection.  Who knows, by the time they are 60 prostate cancer could be detected harmlessly with an MRI and zapped with an injection?

 

Married Catholic priests?

Manaus, Brazil

The Vatican has opened the door to the possibility of married men becoming priests in remote parts of the Amazon basin. There is currently a drastic shortage of priests in the region – which extends across the borders of nine South American countries – and ministering to such a far-flung flock poses severe logistical challenges. Pope Francis first mooted the idea of ordaining viri probati (men of proven virtue) in remote communities two years ago. Now, the idea has been slated for discussion at the Amazon Synod, which is scheduled for October. The candidates for the priesthood should be “elderly men, preferably indigenous, respected and accepted members of their communities”, with grown-up families, says a document outlining the areas for discussion. Currently, the only married Roman Catholic priests are former Anglican priests who converted.  (The Week 22 June 2019)

Sounds to me like the beginning of an unavoidable change.  As candidates for the priesthood become fewer and fewer it seems inevitable that older, married men – and women – are accepted as priests.    And a good thing , too. I used to know an Anglican priest who was married, had worked for years for British Petroleum, and had become a vicar in middle age.  A wise man and a good listener. with a bit of charisma.  That’s what these churches need for pastoral work and for rebuilding congregations.  Not that, as a follower of Epicurus, I have any particular right to advise anyone about the policies of the Catholic church!

Treating your workers as expendable machines

To The Guardian

I fear the plight of the middle class is even worse than Larry Elliott portrays. In addition to being “hollowed out” and suffering stagnant incomes, much of the middle class – public and private sector – has been subjected for two decades to increasing workplace monitoring and micromanagement, bureaucratic control, corporate compliance obligations, target-chasing, constant appraisals, the loss of automatic pay increments based on length of service, hot-desking in battery-farm open-plan offices, “presenteeism” and attacks on “unaffordable” occupational pensions.

Many of the middle class used to enjoy relative autonomy, creativity and professional discretion, based on expertise and trust, in performing their jobs; not any more. Now they are treated as automatons, with any sign of individuality or personality viewed with suspicion by management.

While many politicians and commentators like to pretend that “we are all middle class now”, the reality is that much of the middle class is experiencing “proletarianisation” – they are being treated with the same disdain and dispensability as the working classes have always been.

Pete Dorey, Bath, Somerset. (The Week, 10 May 2019)

I don’t understand where this approach to people-management came from, but I suspect a good bit of it originates in the business schools.   In my personal experience only a few lecturers at business schools have any actual down-and-dirty management experience, but they are very enthusiastic about bottom lines and systems and share prices.

My impression is that the heart and humanity has been excised from matters of commerce and business, whereas management is all about Epicurean teamwork, encouragement, even having a bit of fun along the way.  The new breed of managers  seem driven and humourless – the sort of people who regard their fellow workers as machines.  Nowhere is it recorded, but I suspect Epicurus would maintain that workers should go to work happily and enthusiastically.

Profiteering from migrant kids held in detention camps

The Trump administration has been holding migrant children -whether they came to the U.S. alone or were forcibly separated from their guardians – in a network of makeshift tent camps. An unnamed official at the Department of Health and Human Services told NBCNews that housing costs $775 per child per day.   That’s more than a $675 deluxe guest room at the Trump international hotel in Washington, D.C. (the  average U.S. hotel room costs $229.00).

Maintenance reportedly eats up most of the $775 daily cost per child for the tent camps, since it’s difficult to keep temporary structures suitable for humans in a desert. In permanent facilities run by Health and Human Services, the cost is $256 per person per night, and NBC News estimates that even keeping children with their parents and guardians in Immigration and Customs Enforcement facilities would only cost $298 per night.

Even at the permanent facilities, the conditions are bad, with a lack of soap and blankets.  Clinical-law professor Warren Binford interviewed child detainees at a facility in Clint, Texas, and told  Isaac Chotiner at The New Yorker  “There was food on their shirts, and pants as well. They told us that they were hungry. They told us that some of them had not showered or had not showered until the day or two days before we arrived. Many of them said they had only brushed their teeth once, that there was a lice infestation, as well as an influenza outbreak, at that facility, and that a number of the children are being taken into isolation rooms, quarantine areas where there’s nobody with them except for other sick children.”

Like the prison industry for the U.S. criminal justice system, private companies can make a lot of money in the immigrant-detention business. Private-prison firm Geo Group has reportedly already made $500 million from migrant detention centers since Trump’s “zero tolerance policy” began (reported by the Miami New Times).  Southwest Key Programs, a nonprofit that set up a boys’ shelter, reportedly netted $955 million in federal contracts between 2015 and 2018, according to The New York Times. A network of nonprofit groups, BCFS, reportedly received $179 million in the same time period. BCFS is the same contractor that held migrant kids in parked vans for 39 hours earlier this year, as ICE slowly did the paperwork to reunite the children with their families.

The Texas Tribune reports that Texans have been collecting donations of diapers, soap, and toothbrushes. So far, Customs and Border Protection has refused to accept the donations.  (reported in The Ballot, Conde Nast,  26 June 2029).

My comment:  its hard to know how to express one’s disgust.  This is the United States they are talking about?  We as taxpayers are being made to pay for this Trump policy of “everything has to turn a profit for the election donors”?   How can you support treating little children like this?

But there is another point, seldom discussed: why are the migrants coming in such numbers in the first place?  Have you noticed that the reason for the huge numbers of migrants is described as “fear of the violence”, and little more is said.

As I understand it, this violence in Central America is driven by drug gangs fighting for market share, mostly in the United States. So, if I am right, the poor people of Central America are suffering for the drug habits of rich Americans, while the average US taxpayer, who doesn’t touch a “recreational” drug,  is joining the poor migrants in paying for the self-indulgence of the few, mostly untouchably rich, and having to watch while our government botches the migrant crisis, at huge cost.  This, apparently is making America great again.  Worse, there is no sense of shame – the base loves it. Epicurus, on the other hand, would have condemned everything about it.

 

Environmental concerns begin with population

Letter to The Guardian:

“Your article on “zero heroes” ( e.g zero emission champions) was worthy but it tiptoed around the main factor causing increased global pollution: increasing human numbers.  Progressives often parade their environmental concerns loudly, but are strangely silent on the question of population growth.  How can we get on top of warming planet, increased pollution, habitat destruction snd species extinction if we add 80 million people to the population every year?

“Every country should have a population policy that seeks to stabilise or reduce their population.”

Gordon Payne, Fremantle,  Western Australia. (Guardian Weekly 31 May 2019)

It is astonishing, is it not, that so few people focus on population growth when talking about the climate crisis? What we ought to be doing is offering family planning to people all over the globe who, for cultural, religious and financial reasons, have no access to it – if they want it (we can’t make them).  This particularly applies to Africa, whose population growth is a huge and destabilising problem (we have only seen the tip of the iceberg so far in terms of African migration to Europe).  India, already the most populous country on Earth, is another example.  There they already have  a serious water problem.  Culture and religion stand in the way of sensible policy.

 

How to behave on a date

Unbelievably, The Independent newspaper recently offered the following tips on dating behaviour:
  • Even if the conversation has run dry within 15 minutes, do not do a runner. It’s just mean and rude.
  • No “negging” – handing out backhanded compliments to gain the psychological upper hand. Although recommended by pick-up “experts”, it usually backfires for those looking for long-term romance.
  • Even if you are getting on brilliantly, rein in your fantasies about the future. Don’t make jokes about your wedding, and do not invite your companion to an event too far in the future.
  • Don’t treat it like a job interview. “How did you choose to spend your time during the career gap you had in 2017?” is not an appropriate question. Try to make the sharing of personal information reciprocal.
  • Don’t bring a friend. It may put you at ease, but it’s sure to have the opposite effect on your date.
  • Even if it’s going badly, don’t exploit your date for their professional expertise, however tempting it may be.

Wouldn’t you think all this would be common sense?  Whatever happened to judgment?  It might have been appropriate to tell the reader, not only what not to do, but what works best.  If I may make  some common sense suggestions:

*    Make her laugh

*    Make her laugh

*    Make her laugh

*    Ask her questions and don’t talk about yourself unless she asks.

*     Self-deprecation with a wry grin often works a treat ( in England, anyway!)

Please add to the above.  Only the experienced and successful need apply.

 

The genius of Einstein

Walter Isaacson, biographer ofAlbert Einstein, writes the following (page 550):

Perhaps the most important aspect of his personality was his willingness to be non- conformist. “The theme I recognise in Galileo’s work” , he said, “ is the passionate fight against any kind of dogma based on authority”.

Plank, Poincare and Lorentz all came close to some of the breakthroughs Einstein made in 1905.  But they were a little too confined by dogma based on authority.  Einstein alone among them was rebellious enough to throw out the conventional thinking that had defined science for centuries.

Einstein’s fundamental creed was that freedom was the lifeblood of creativity.  “The development of science and of the creative activities of the spirit, “ he said,” requires a freedom that consists in the independence of thought from the restrictions of authoritarian and social prejudice”.  Nurturing that should be the fundamental role of government and the mission of education”.

There was a simple set of formulas that defined Einstein’s outlook. Creativity required  being willing not to conform.  That required nurturing free minds and free spirits, which in turn required “a spirit of tolerance”. And an underpinning of tolerance was humility – the belief that no one had the right to impose ideas and beliefs on others

The world had seen a lot of impudent geniuses.  What made Einstein special was that his mind and soul were tempered by this humility.  He could be serenely self- confident in his lonely course yet also humbly awed by the beauty if nature’s handiwork…….

For some people, miracles serve as evidence of God’s existence.  For Einstein it was the absence of miracles that reflected divine providence.  The fact that the cosmos is comprehensible, that it follows laws, is worthy of awe”.   ( Einstein – his Life and Universe” by Walter Isaacson, published by Simon & Schuster, 2008)

What kept them?

Copthorne Primary school in West Yorkshire, UK, has banned its pupils from using the word “like” as a filler.  In future, those who pepper their sentences with “likes” will be asked to spend five minutes thinking about how they might have expressed themselves better.

The verbal tic is thought to be spreading thanks to shows like Love Island: in 2017, a contestant said “like” 36 times in 90 seconds.

Spreading?   It’s already everywhere.  It’s like (whoops!) “you know”, also a filler and I suppose it is popular because the user hasn’t thought through what he or she intended to say, and is trying to prevent interruption. Leaving aside the United States for a moment (students at Georgetown University can be heard using it every five seconds, walking down the street talking interminably on their phones), I fear that the good old British class divisions will ensure that “like” becomes a class identifier.

Well, it isn’t classy, is it?

(You thought people had stopped talking about class in Britain?  Yes, they have, but it is still there)