Inequality thrives

Citigroup CEO Michael Corbat has a good thing going.

Corbat pocketed $24 million last year and $24 million the year before. This year, Citibank, the world’s largest credit card issuer, has an even better thing going. Citi is paying just 0.35 percent interest on corona-crisis loans from the Federal Reserve and charging customers as much as 27.4 percent in credit-card interest. That spread is generating oodles of dollars that Corbat would like to pass on to Citi shareholders like himself. But the Federal Reserve wants Citi and other big banks to sit on their cash as a guard against a financial system crash, and last month announced mild limits on the dividends banks can shell out.

Corbat remains unimpressed by Fed worries about financial fragility. Notes the Citi CEO: “From our perspective, our dividend is sound, and we plan on continuing to pay it.” Corbat’s solicitude for the well-being of his shareholders doesn’t seem to extend to his customers. This past spring, Citi accounted for four times more credit-card complaints to federal regulators than any other major bank.  (inequality.org, June 2020).

My comment:  What do you expect?  The priority is making money, with attendant privileges.   Customers are a background irritant, to be impatiently attended to  between being wined and dined by politicians and lounging on the yacht.

Fertility rate: ‘jaw-dropping’ global crash in children being born”

Falling fertility rates mean that nearly every country could have shrinking populations by the end of the century. 23 nations – including Spain and Japan – are expected to see their populations halve by 2100.  Countries will also age dramatically, with as many people turning 80 as there are being born.

The fertility rate – the average number of children a woman gives birth to – is falling. If the number falls below approximately 2.1, then the size of the population starts to fall. While in 1950, women were having an average of 4.7 children in their lifetime, the global fertility rate nearly halved to 2.4 in 2017. A study in The Lancet projects that it will fall below 1.7 by 2100.   As a result, the researchers expect the number of people on the planet to peak at 9.7 billion around 2064, before falling  to 8.8 billion by the end of the century.

Why is this happening?   It has nothing to do with sperm counts or the usual things that come to mind when discussing fertility.   Instead it is being driven by more women in education and work, as well as greater access to contraception, leading to women choosing to have fewer children.

Japan’s population is projected to fall from a peak of 128 million in 2017 to less than 53 million by the end of the century.  Italy is expected to see an equally dramatic population crash from 61 million to 28 million over the same timeframe.  These are two of 23 countries – including Spain, Portugal, Thailand and South Korea – expected to see their population more than halve.

China, currently the most populous nation in the world, is expected to peak at 1.4 billion in four years time before nearly halving to 732 million by 2100! The UK is predicted to peak at 75 million in 2063, and fall to 71 million. 

This is a global issue, with 183 out of 195 countries having a fertility rate below the replacement level.  It is great for the environment, with lower carbon emissions and less deforestation.  The problem is that there will be more old people than young people,  a shift from young to old.  The number of under-fives will fall from 681 million in 2017 to 401 million in 2100, but over 80-year-olds will soar from 141 million in 2017 to 866 million in 2100.

Who pays tax in a massively aged world? Who pays for healthcare for the elderly? Who looks after the elderly? Will people still be able to retire from work?  (By James Gallagher, Health and science correspondent, BBC;  researcher Prof Christopher Murray, and The Lancet, 15 July 2020)

My comment: There are too many people in the world, and too many semi-educated and poorly brought-up people at that.  However, the comment about taxation and who is going to look after the oldies is a killer, I agree. Life is going to get increasingly tough.  But maybe a greatly reduced population is the price we have to pay for the survival of the human race at all.  We can’t go on grossly abusing the planet indefinitely.

Apparently a true story

This  is apparently the actual dialogue, from the WordPerfect customer support Helpline,  transcribed from a recording monitoring the customer care department. Needless to say the Help Desk employee was fired; however, he/she is currently suing the WordPerfect organization for ‘Termination without Cause’.

Operator:         ‘Ridge Hall, computer assistance; may I help you?’
Caller:              ‘Yes, well, I’m having trouble with WordPerfect ‘
Operator:         ‘What sort of trouble?’
Caller:              ‘Well, I was just typing along, and all of a sudden the words went away.’
Operator:         ‘Went away?’
Caller:              ‘They disappeared’
Operator:         ‘Hmm. So what does your screen look like now?’
Caller:              ‘Nothing.’
Operator:         ‘Nothing??’
Caller:              ‘It’s blank; it won’t accept anything when I type.’
Operator:         ‘Are you still in WordPerfect, or did you get out?’
Caller:              ‘How do I tell?’
Operator:        ‘Can you see the ‘C: prompt’ on the screen?’
Caller:              ‘What’s a sea-prompt?’
Operator:         ‘Never mind, can you move your cursor around the screen?’
Caller:              ‘There isn’t any cursor; I told you, it won’t accept anything I type.’
Operator:         ‘Does your monitor have a power indicator?’
Caller:              ‘What’s a monitor?’
Operator:         ‘It’s the thing with the screen on it that looks like a TV. 
                          Does it have a little light that tells you when it’s on?’
Caller:              ‘I don’t know.’
Operator:        ‘Well, then look on the back of the monitor and find where 
                         the power cord goes into it. Can you see that??’
Caller:             ‘Yes, I think so.’
Operator:       ‘Great. Follow the cord to the plug, and tell me if it’s 
                         plugged into the wall..
Caller:             ‘Yes, it is.’
Operator:        ‘When you were behind the monitor, did you notice that 
                         there were two cables plugged into the back of it, not just one? ‘
Caller:              ‘No.’
Operator:         ‘Well, there are. I need you to look back there again and 
                         find the other cable.’
Caller:              ‘Okay, here it is.’
Operator:          ‘Follow it for me, and tell me if it’s plugged securely into 
                          the back of your computer..’
Caller:               ‘I can’t reach.’
Operator:          ‘OK. Well, can you see if it is?’
Caller:               ‘No…’
Operator:          ‘Even if you maybe put your knee on something and lean way over?’
Caller:               ‘Well, it’s not because I don’t have the right angle — it’s because it’s dark.’
Operator:          ‘Dark?’
Caller:               ‘Yes – the office light is off, and the only light I have is 
                          coming in from the window.’
Operator:          ‘Well, turn on the office light then.’
Caller:               ‘I can’t..’
Operator:          ‘No? Why not?’
Caller:              ‘Because there’s a power failure.’
Operator:         ‘A power …. A power failure? Aha. Okay, we’ve got it   
                         licked now. Do you still have the boxes and manuals and   
                         packing stuff that your computer came in?’
Caller:              ‘Well, yes, I keep them in the closet..’
Operator:         ‘Good. Go get them, and unplug your system and pack it up just like it was when you            

                          got it.  Then take it back to the store you bought it from.’
Caller:              ‘Really? Is it that bad?’
Operator:        ‘Yes, I’m afraid it is.’
Caller:              ‘Well, all right then, I suppose.  What do I tell them?’
Operator:         ‘Tell them you’re too damned stupid to own a computer!’

A little matter of gross hypocrisy

Bet you didn’t know!  The Anti Defamation League (ADL), a self-proclaimed Jewish civil rights group, is the largest non-governmental trainer of police in this country, facilitating an exchange of the worst practices between U.S. police, ICE and FBI, and the Israeli police and military.  This is kept rather quiet, for obvious reasons.

The US government gives billions to fund Israel’s military occupation of Palestinian land.  Arms companies “field test” their weapons and technology on occupied Palestinians.  Meanwhile, organisation that claim to speak for Jewish community defend the state of Israel while currently paying hypocritical lip service to Black lives.

It has to be said that U.S. police exchanges with Israeli forces are not responsible for the centuries of deadly violence American police have dealt to Black people on our own streets in the US. The militarized tactics and technologies acquired through police exchange programs go directly to executing the unchanged mission of the American police, established long before the founding of the state of Israel.

But  the ADL “solidarity” with Black lives in the U.S. means nothing if they maintain their partnerships with the U.S. police and help export the tactics used by the Israeli military to oppress Palestinians.

My comment: This is part and parcel of the overall militarization of US police forces, a militarisation that one would think should be unconstitutional.  There is no rationale for overwhelming force on the streets of America, except in the messed up minds of White supremacists and ethics-free politicians who will stop at nothing to scare up the votes. But, in addition, to export weapons and technology to overawe, bully  and kill defenseless Arabs,  is a scandal.  It is also anti- Epicurean.

Now is the moment for the ADL to stop organizing police exchanges!  

The shame Americans should feel: corona virus and the big donations

Why is the US corona virus situation such a disgraceful mess?

All politicians in America depend on big donors for their elections. That is a given. But some governors, (mainly in the South) are more than ever in the pockets of the super-rich in a country of obscene disparities of wealth. Having donated handsomely, the billionaires want urgent pay back. Massive tax breaks are not enough for these people.  In the case of the virus they wanted, and got, the re-opening of closed-down economies, nearly all of them far, far too early and sloppily, egged on by the President and fear that their re- election could be iffy if businesses remained closed.

So I hope the governors and other state and federal politicians are pleased with themselves.  In return for the reopening of the economic spigots they have full hospital beds and alarming numbers of infections and deaths.  Has it occurred to them that this is tantamount to man and woman-slaughter?  What do their deeply religious and holy supporters think.  Apparently, they don’t care either.

I get to read news from all over the world. Countries which are nowhere in the wealth scale dealt with covid19 better than this. We are suffering because of greed, and we should hang our heads in shame.  It has been an incompetent mess, but I can guarantee that none of the people responsible will ever be accountable.  If you are not sick of this you haven’t been paying attention!

This is not about politics; it is about Epicureanism and humanism, and basic care for the health and welfare of one’s fellow citizens.  Why is this so hard to understand?

Supreme Court and religion

”In two blows to church-state separation, Justices Breyer and Kagan joined the conservative majority on the Supreme Court in granting even more preferential treatment to religious bodies. In one case, the court gave the green light to religious employers to apply the “ministerial exemption” to pretty much any employee; a teacher is a coach is a priest, and none can seek legal redress if they feel they’ve been discriminated against on the job. In the other case, employers who think it’s wicked for women not to want a baby every time they have sex can get out of covering birth control in their health insurance policies.

“It is a clear win for the First Amendment and religious liberty when the highest court affirms the right of religious institutions to be free of government interference and meddling,” said Grazie Christie, a radiologist and policy advisor for The Catholic Association.

“The AP reports that the US Roman Catholic Church has recently “used a special and unprecedented exemption from federal rules to amass at least $1.4 billion in taxpayer-backed coronavirus aid, with many millions going to dioceses that have paid huge settlements or sought bankruptcy protection because of clergy sexual abuse cover-ups.” They go on to say the haul may have been twice that much—reaching or even exceeding $3.5 billion. Guess this is the kind of meddling that’s A-okay with the church.

“In short, SCOTUS says let the churches do whatever they please, and the Trump administration gives them buckets of money to do it with.

“This isn’t religious liberty—it’s religious exceptionalism and bigotry. Religion should never be an excuse to discriminate, and our government should never put church before state.”.   (Jennifer Bardi,  Senior Editor, The Humanist 11 June 2020).

My comment:  I don’t want our tax dollars directed to re-filling the coffers of a church which has cast a blind eye on sexual predation, and mis-handled the whole issue.  I think it appalling that  “religious employers” should be allowed to decide whether or not an employee should or should not have a baby and exclude her from company health policy at will.  This whole issue is being dictated by a small minority of religious extremists who should get out of the bedroom and concentrate on helping to suppress Covid-19, which they have uncaringly ( and, I would argue, greedily) allowed to roar back.

There is absolutely nothing Epicurus would have in common with these cruel and intrusive people.

 

A weird question to the New Scientist, plus two answers

“If I wanted to be buried so that I was eventually fossilised, for possible discovery in the far future, where would be the best location on Earth to do this?”  (Jonathan Wallace, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK)

If your aim is to be fossilised after you die, I would suggest that you ask your relatives to sink your body rapidly into one of the “dead zones” that occur in some of the world’s seas. Where large rivers meet the sea, the massive organic load sometimes results in low-oxygen conditions over vast areas that are largely devoid of most living organisms.

In such anoxic conditions, your body is unlikely to get eaten by fish, crustaceans or other scavengers. At the same time, the huge amount of sediment coming from the river as the current slows should ensure that your body will be rapidly covered by layers of sediment that will potentially become sedimentary rock in aeons to come.

A good location might be in the Gulf of Mexico, in the area where the Mississippi disgorges itself. Parts of the Black Sea would also be good candidates.

Jon Noad

12055345767968669487.jpg

Calgary, Alberta, Canada

There are many ways to get fossilised. If you want the process to go quickly, then find a tree that exudes resin. Leave your body at the base of the tree and allow the resin to gradually cover it.

Eventually, the resin will turn to amber. The only problem is that you would need to find a very large tree, because the amount of amber created by this process is generally quite small. It might be possible to fossilise your head, but probably not your whole body.

Other places where at least parts of your body could be encased in sediment include streams that run through limestone. The dissolved lime (calcium oxide) precipitates as travertine, a sedimentary rock that is a form of limestone rather like the calcium carbonate that coats the element in your kettle. Travertine can quickly cover small items.

A slower yet perhaps more straightforward approach would be to bury your body beneath the sea or a lake bed, in an area where there is little oxygen permeating into the substrate, so that scavengers cannot invade the sediment and eat you.

Many soda lakes in Africa fit this profile, although their alkali water can be caustic, and might eat away at your remains. But the calcified remains of animals found around Lake Natron in Tanzania suggest that this method could work.

Choose a lake with slow-moving currents, because the sediment being deposited will be fine-grained. This will lead to less disturbance and to better preservation of your soft parts as a black carbon film, and with luck may even preserve your facial features. Deep sea beds should also work well, which is what created the famous Burgess Shale in British Columbia, Canada, for example.

The best option may be northern Australian coast. The unique geochemistry of the mangrove muds lead to animals such as mangrove lobsters (Thalassina anomala) becoming fossilised in as little as 5000 years.

12055345767968669487.jpgBurying your corpse here should guarantee fossilisation, with the bonus that a nodule called a concretion will form around you that will preserve your skeleton in three dimensions.

My comment:  I know some people who are already fossilized, without the need for burial anywhere.

Corruption on public display

The federal government’s Paycheck Protection Program, a massive, multi-billion loan program designed to keep small businesses afloat and retain jobs as part of the CARES Act stimulus package, got a lot of heat for its seemingly opaque application and approval process when it debuted back in March. Now, as reports emerge of multi-million dollar handouts to wealthy donors, friends, family, and corrupt firms, it’s obvious that heat was well-deserved.

We are told that the public do not trust the government, and this is not likely to reverse that verdict. Companies with multiple branches, such as restaurants, put in for loans that treated each branch as a separate business, and this meant that the company walked away with massive handouts. – of our money.  This is not just a matter of maladministration; it is a matter of corruption.   Epicurus, who stood for openness and honesty would have been disgusted.

The virus has been around longer than we thought

Milan, Italy

Scientific analysis of sewage samples has shown that the novel coronavirus was present in both Milan and Turin by mid-December, more than two months before Italy’s first case was diagnosed in Codogno, southeast of Milan, on 20 February. Covid-19 patients are believed to shed the virus in their faeces from the time they are infected – often days before they are symptomatic – so analysis of sewage water can be used to identify outbreaks well before they are obvious to doctors. “After the outbreak we were testing sewage for the virus and realised we could check back in time by analysing old frozen samples,” explained Dr Luca Lucentini of Italy’s national health institute. The finding is one of several from around the world to suggest that by the time China raised the alarm, in January, the virus had spread far more extensively than initially realised.  (The Week, 27 June 2020)

 My take:  When I was at school I did dismally at physics and chemistry, and my mathematical ability was not great.  I still feel more comfortable with History and the arts.  However, unlike far too many modern day, politically engaged Americans,  I respect science and scientists deeply and admire their hard work and diligence.  This crisis, so harmful for the peace of mind, would be ten times worse were it not for the scientists and health experts.  I want to say a huge “ thank you” to them all and beg them not to be intimidated by know-nothing bullies with strange, indifferent attitudes towards the health and welfare of their fellow citizens.  Epicureanism is partly based on respect for others doing their best.

Microplastics are everywhere

Tiny pieces of plastic that pollute the environment can be produced by simply opening a plastic bottle or tearing a food wrapper.

Microplastics are between 0.001 and 5 millimetres in size and are usually either produced directly, or form when large plastic debris breaks up. We now know that millions of tonnes of microplastics are abundant in the environment and can harm marine life by entering the food chain. Microplastics are also found in our food  although the effect on human health is still unclear.

Cheng Fang at the University of Newcastle, Australia and his colleagues tested whether everyday activities could release microplastics. They opened common plastic items such as bags, bottles and packaging film by twisting the bottle cap or tearing the bag, for example, or by cutting them with scissors or a knife, which deforms and fractures the plastic.

The team used a scale that is sensitive to weights as low as one nanogram to collect and measure the microplastics that landed on its surface. Between about 10 and 30 nanograms of microplastic were released from opening the plastic items, which amounts to between 14,000 and 75,000 individual microplastic particles. But the team says that the true amount released is probably even higher, because many microplastics are statically charged and remain in the air.

Studying the microplastics with a microscope revealed that most were in the form of fragments or fibres of varying shape and size. Some could be seen with the naked eye, such as those from cutting bottles. The team also used a technique called spectroscopy to deduce the microplastics’ chemical composition and found the majority were made of polyethylene, one of the most widely used plastics.

“This finding sends an important warning,” says Fang. “We might need to take our own responsibility and work with industry together to reduce [microplastics].”

Comment from Christian Dunn at Bangor University, UK: : “I’d love to say that I’m surprised and shocked at the results, but unfortunately, I’m not and you are  not. We’re now realising that microplastics are literally everywhere.   It is now crucial that we work to find out their  possible health effects, and cut back on unnecessary plastic use”.  (Gege Li, March 28 2020)Journal reference: Nature Scientific Report. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-61146-4)

Epicureanism and politics

Message to this blog

“I believe a “supporter of Epicurus” as you and I are could say something about politics from time to time. Indeed, most of the time, if you try to follow Epicurus thoughts, you should eschew politics (for example : Principal Doctrine XIV). But not all the time.

Talking about Justice, Epicurus states clearly that you may act when the time is right, precisely when “actions which were formerly considered to be just under former circumstances are seen not to accord with the general concept of mutual advantage” (Principal Doctrine XXXVIII).

Where is the “mutual advantage” to let governments act like common thieves ? Nowhere. Let’s follow the thoughts of Epicurus and do something about it ! No contradiction here : Do you agree ?” (Julien Primavera in a reply to a posting on Epicurus.Today, June 1).

My comment:  the US is so divided and prone to misinformation and downright lies that I would compare it with Italy and Germany after the 1929 financial catastrophe.  Once we enter the maelstrom of political lies and the winding up of those who feel aggrieved, then we worsen a dreadful situation.  To what end?  Engaging in this riles you up and makes you more anxious, destroying ataraxia.  Vote, yes, absolutely, but don’t engage in ad hominem verbal contests with the ignorant and ill-informed.  You will never win, because these people do not have the education, knowledge and good parenting to actually listen.  They know what they know.  Period.

De-funding the police?

The phrase “defund the police” quickly gained popularity, but the term isn’t a call to eliminate the police entirely – it is simply meant to draw attention to the outsized funds that police departments receive from state and local governments, often accounting for more than a third, and sometimes more than half, of an entire budget in normal times. In the middle of an unprecedented economic and health crisis, police departments are often the only government entity that aren’t seeing any budget cuts whatsoever. 

In Los Angeles, for example, Mayor Eric Garcetti’s new budget for 2020-21 proposes allocating 54% of city funds to the LAPD. New York City’s policing budget is $5 billion, more than the city spends on agencies for health, homeless services, housing, and youth development combined. Chicago spends 39% of its resources on policing, and has proposed increases this year. 

You don’t have to agree with all the protests to see the issue here. Consider, instead, this question: are we really getting what we pay for with these massive policing budgets? If states and local governments are going to sacrifice public services for their police, it makes sense to ensure that they’re getting the optimal value for their citizens.

There’s little to no evidence to suggest that more policing has a significant impact on crime.  On the contrary, it simply increases violent altercations between people of color and the police. So what actually does reduce crime?  What does make a difference is investment in education, healthcare, transit, and community development.  These are the Cinderellas of public service. ( Patriotic Millionaires)

Are there any available aliens out there?

Since E.T has yet to show up on our planet, estimating the number of alien civilisations in our galaxy might seem a premature – and rather futile – exercise. But that hasn’t stopped the authors of a new study from claiming that across the entire Milky Way, there are probably just over 30, each with the intelligence and technology to make contact with other planets.

The researchers, from the University of Nottingham, arrived at this conclusion by adapting a sequential method developed by the astronomer Frank Drake in 1961. First, they estimated what proportion of stars in the Milky Way are more than five billion years old (the assumed minimum period in which intelligent life can develop). Next, they calculated how many of those stars would be dense and stable enough to host planetary systems. Then, drawing on recent findings about the distribution of exoplanets, they estimated the number of rocky planets within the habitable zones of the stars. Finally, they calculated how many of the planets capable of supporting intelligent life would be likely to still be doing so at this moment: for this, they made the conservative assumption, based on how long radio communication has existed on Earth, that intelligent civilisations only survive long enough to broadcast for 100 years.

These calculations led the scientists to conclude that there are 36 contactable civilisations in the Milky Way right now. However, they point out, our chances of making contact with any of them are slim, because the closest one is likely to be 17,000 light years away – meaning that two-way communication with it would take 6,120 years.  (The Week, 27 June 2020).

My thought:  Shame!  I was hoping to import one or two really competent, smart, benevolent and public-spirited aliens to start all over again from scratch and set our planet right. We have, collectively, made a dog’s dinner of it here.

Rules fit for ridicule

Letter to The Guardian

Now let me see if I’ve got this right. Single people can only be in a bubble with one other household, but bigger households can meet with numerous other households and can stay overnight, but must stay two metres apart. And you can go into a pub as long as you stay two metres apart, unless you can’t stay two metres apart, then you must stay one-plus metres apart. You can go up to the counter in a shop, but not in a pub or restaurant. You have to give your name and address if you go to a pub, but not in a shop. You have to wear a mask on a bus, but not in a shop (not sure about pubs). You can have your hair cut from 4 July, but not your nails painted or legs waxed.

But that’s only in England. It’s completely different in Scotland or Northern Ireland. You can’t go to Wales, but you can go to Spain, but you can’t go out for two weeks when you come back. So just remind me: are we still supposed to be washing our hands?

Gail Mitchell, Gotham, Nottinghamshire.  (The Week, 4 July 2020)

 My comment:  0ne of the enjoyable things about England is the sense of humour and the witheringly funny critiques of politicians published in newspapers, on TV and the radio.  If you are a politician in England you have to know how to take a joke at your expense and put up with being taken apart at regular intervals.  Boris and his cohort oh, so wanted to be in power, and so far, approval ratings tanking, they are doing a truly awful  job.  The population is bewildered and confused, and the leadership a load of hot air. Boris thinks ( seriously!) that his policies, including Brexit , will “ make Britain great again”.  No one knows how to do that, least of all a conservative government, always a muddle.

Yes, O know, no party politics!  But what do you do when you have dual citizenship of two countries clearly being so chaotically governed?  Just sit here and shrug?

Covid-19 pandemic risks worst global food crisis in decades

The covid-19 pandemic’s impact on hunger around the world could be worse than the calamitous spike in food prices of 2007 and 2008, a leading food security expert warns.

Unlike the scarcity of food during the crisis 13 years ago, the big issue this time is the economic downturn hitting the ability of millions of people to afford food.  This has the potential to be more significant than the last time around,  because of the unknown extent and longevity of the global recession, which could push millions of people into extreme poverty, and food insecurity, which the United Nations’ World Food Programme (WFP) recently cautioned could double the number of food- insecure people to around 265 million globally.

“Today, the problem is not a problem of food availability (food stocks are around double the level they were during 2007 to 2008); the problem today is of food access,” he says. “We have a very good harvest of cereals this year. The problem is logistical, especially with high value commodities because they are perishable and any logistic delay will affect them. Difficulty moving food around in the face of trade and travel restrictions is going to be a big challenge.  Thus we have the ironic situation of rising hunger in a world of plenty.

Other problems

1. Lower demand is leading to lower prices, which will mean farmers need support to cope in many parts of the world. Prices have declined three months in a row, with April 2020, down 3 per cent on April 2019. 

2.  With many younger people leaving for cities, farmers tend to be older and so more vulnerable if the coronavirus reaches them and they are infected, and this would affect production

3.  About 65 million children normally eat some form of nutritious meal at school but are no longer getting it.  Work is under way with governments to replace those meals.

4. Plagues of locusts in the Horn of Africa, which the FAO says is the worst in a quarter of a century.

(Adam Vaughan. New Scientist , 23 May 2020, quoting work byMartin Cole, University of Adelaide and Maximo Torero at the UN’s Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO).

My comment:  Aside from a few countries, particularly those run by women, we have no leaders to dig us out of all this.