Will we see the effective end to this “ industry”?

Arnold Donald, the CEO of the world’s largest cruise line, thinks his industry is getting a bad coronavirus rap. COVID-19 hotspots on seven of his now shut-down Carnival cruise ships have left 39 dead. But Donald has been busy insisting that “a cruise ship is not a riskier environment.” His vessels, says Donald, more resemble Central Park: “There’s a lot of natural social distancing.”

Public health experts disagree. A Centers for Disease Control and Prevention report has concluded that a “closed environment, contact between travelers from many countries, and crew transfers between ships” makes ocean merriment like Carnival’s a predictable setting for “outbreaks of infectious diseases.” Donald himself is predicting that Carnival will come back bigger than ever at the end of June, since “people love cruising.” For CEOs, cruise ships are  certainly rewarding. Donald was paid $11.1 million last year, 723 times the take-home of Carnival’s typical employee. His CEO predecessor, Micky Arison, has a personal fortune of $8.1-billion.

My comment:  Once upon a time I was offered a contract as a singer with a band on a cruise ship.  The look on the face of my mother-in- law-to- be quickly disabused me of the wisdom of the idea!

In those days you had smaller ships and companies like Swan Hellenic, which stressed the history and culture of the ports visited.  The experience was educational. Now the cruise ships, especially those operated by Carnival are gigantic, the food tables groan, passengers eat far too much with too little exercise, and the visits to ports mainly involve the sale of tawdry souvenirs (meals are all on the ships) and do little for the locals.  What the ship do is to pour muck into the oceans and despoil the environment (poor Venice!).  Many people in ports were up in arms well before the virus struck.  I might still be a singer on one of those monsters – shudder!

 

 

Something in common

Not that long ago, but it feels like a lost age, the Big Worry used to be that there was nothing to talk about over the water cooler any more. Because we watched our own flavour of streamed television and were targeted with personalised ads on Facebook, we in the 21st century had no common cause. Even the little list of events comprising the news was kind of irrelevant. We were never going to have a national conversation again. We wish.  In fact, public debate has not been fracturing but snowballing.

Now we have a giant rolling snowball of ‘mono-news’, a single topic that obliterates all others for years at a time. First Trump, then Brexit, now the pandemic: the water cooler is so busy it needs constant disinfection.”.   (Helen Rumbelow in The Times)

My comment:  One of the (usually dubious) benefits of old age is that you can read a whole newspaper and half an hour later barely remember a single thing you’ve read.  This turns out to be a blessing.  Items that riled you up in the past – the lies, misrepresentations, the political shenanigans, the incomprehensible interpretations of christianity – all are blessedly consigned to an inaccessible part of what used to be a brain.   Of course, you cannot then discuss it all with your wife, but then you usually agree on most things.  Only now such conversations about current affairs are even shorter.  So much better to go for a nice walk in the Spring weather.

A little spotlight on our priorities

A local opinion poll was taken in our district the other day. It asked which local facilities are you missing most, being locked in at home.  The sample was modest, just under 2000 respondents, but the results were interesting:

Going out to restaurants.                        38%

Getting a haircut or other

personal grooming.                                  12%

Sending kids to school.                             8%

Going to your workplace.                          6%

Visiting your place of worship.                  6%

Going to the gym or fitness center.         15%

Going out to parks and outdoor spaces   11%

Other.                                                            5%

………..So working in the office and praying at church can’t match a meal out or keeping fit.  Sounds reassuringly Epicurean.

Food stamp program: 688,000 excluded

Over the summer of 2019 the president indicated that his team thought low-income families were getting a too greedy about food.  He announced a new plan designed to exclude hundreds of thousands of people from the food stamp program. This was done last December by tightening  work requirements for able-bodied adults with no dependents, the U.S. Department of Agriculture said.

Under the old law, able-bodied adults without dependents could receive SNAP benefits for a maximum of three months during a three-year period, unless they were working or enrolled in an education or training program for 80 hours a month.

But states were able to waive this time limit to ensure access to food stamps during the ups and downs of reentering the workforce. Before this rule, counties with an unemployment rate as low as 2.5% were included in waived areas. The new rule, which took effect on April 1st tightened  the criteria for states applying for such waivers, making 6% the minimum unemployment rate for a county to receive a waiver….

If you don’t understand all this, don’t worry!  Nor do I! The point is that 688,000 of the nation’s poorest and neediest people have been be dropped from SNAP (adapted from an article in Washington Post, 4 December 2019)

My comment:  This posting has to be read in conjunction with tax reductions to long-suffering big companies and the super-rich, even requested bail-outs. To those who have shall be given; to those with little, well, who cares? If they don’t make money, let them be hungry.  Makes you wonder how Christianity ever crushed the rational and decent Epicureans.  But it did, which makes you wonder about human beings.  

When you witness blatant cruelty and inhumanity I suggest that you have a moral right to protest.  This is not party political; it is about human decency.

 

The requirements of success

“The most misleading idea I picked up at school was that success is the result of intelligence. It’s not: it’s the result of doing things. This seems so obvious now, I can’t believe nobody drummed it into me at school. So I never did an internship or tried to get myself elected to a prestigious student body. I assumed my good grades would transform themselves into a job. I spent three years working in a bookshop.

“When we think we see intellect what we’re really looking at is energy. The really energetic write pushy emails demanding work. They apply for grants, they go to parties, they network. All this stuff is exhausting and a lot of people who do it are ghastly, but it should be more widely taught that life requires this sort of effort.”
(James Marriott ,The Times, London)

My comment:  How right you are, Mr. Marriott!  During my early life I learned that a good degree and excellent reports from a prestigious school and university guaranteed nothing.  Indeed, the better the degree the more suspect you seemed to be (“Don’t want that fellow with the fancy degree coming in and telling us what to do”, or “He’ll quickly get bored here and we’ll have lost time” type of attitude).  Unless you work very hard at it, as Mr. Marriott suggests, you are considered to be suitable for the civil service, maybe (nothing wrong with that, of course, but it narrows the options). This is tough on the introverts for whom networking, parties and selling themselves come hard.   This is where teachings of Epicurus are particularly pertinent –  friends can help where otherwise your curricula vitae can end up on the discard pile.