Cyrenaic philosophers and hedonism

It was the philosophers, Aristippus the Older and Aristippus the Younger, who lived in Cyrenaica, who first suggested that hedonism was the right waty to conduct a good life. That basic idea, modified of course, was adopted by Epicurus, and later was misinterpreted by the early Christians to mean a life of total self-indulgence, eating, and drinking, careless of the duties of life. Basically, the latter believed we are all sinners and should be endlessly tormented by the “fact” and cover ourselves in sackcloth and ashes. How this strange point of view gained traction is a mystery and a misery.

So maybe it’s got something to do with my Anglican upbringing, but I feel most uncomfortable about too literal an interpretation of “hedonism”, which has these unfortunate connotations of self-indulgence. It denotes selfishness and excludes any idea of doing constructive things for other people. I prefer the idea of pursuing what gives you pleasure. One can pursue a life of pleasure, fueled with moderate amounts of wine and good living, by doing a job you love, by involvement in the arts, by devoting yourself lovingly to another person, or helping the sick and poor. And a hundred other things, since we are all different, with different outlooks and interests (itself a wonderful aspect of the human condition).

Giving of yourself can be a joy, in particular. Philosophers seldom say so. Gorging yourself with food, drink and cigars, on the other hand, is not only unattractive and vulgar, but is elitist, since only rich, spoiled people have the means to crudely self-indulge.  Epicurus, as we all know, was modest in his daily living and an advocate of the restrained Mediterranean diet. He also ran a “flat” organisation, and was no empire building CEO. Good guy, which is why I like him.

So while we can be grateful to the Cyrenaic philosophers for rejecting a monastic life of woe, sackcloth and ashes, eating only porridge and lashing yourself with leather-thonged whips, I think (unless I missed something) that they should have been more expansive in their definition of hedonism. Let us enjoy the short lives afforded us, but do so in moderation, generosity, and with a sense of humour.

One Comment

  1. Excellent article as always! One of the aspects of hedonism is particularly adhere to is the emphasis on individual discretion and personal responsibility. I think you should generally do what you think will make you happier, provided you accept any negative consequences. I often find that religion has an appeal insofar as it allows you to pass on your sins to a deity or some sort of spiritual means of redemption (fasting, giving money, saying Hail Marys, etc) Whereas for the hedonist, no such buck passing exists, forcing them to face up to the reality of the situation, rather than pretending that everything is going to be fine because God has forgiven them.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.