The Tories pride themselves on being “family-friendly”, says Giles Fraser. Yet their belief in nurturing this precious institution doesn’t extend to “those of us who fall in love with foreigners”. Under a policy introduced in 2012 – and upheld last week by the Supreme Court – Britons applying to bring a non-EU partner or spouse to live with them in the UK must earn at least £18,600 a year. So no problems for the Queen and Prince Philip, and an effective bar to “scam marriages set up for money, or lonely men conned into acquiring mail-order brides from Belarus over the internet”. But what about the rest of us? Nearly 40% of Britain’s working population, and a majority of its young people, earn less than that; in which case you and your partner either have to live apart or “shove off and set up family life elsewhere”. When my foreign-born wife and I went to a registry office to set a date for our marriage, we were interrogated as if we were “smuggling heroin though passport control”. The UK is now “the least-welcoming country to mixed-nationality couples in the Western world”. (Giles Fraser, The Guardian).
Returning from France a year or two ago, my wife, who is American, had a very unpleasant conversation at UK passport control in Paris with a very aggressive official. She was reluctantly allowed into England, but even though she is legally allowed to be there for up to six months in a year. The effect of this sort of treatment is discouraging for those who, not contemplating immigration, are simply visiting for more than a week or two (we were staying 4 months). At one point we talked about her staying in England for several years as my spouse, in order to apply for British citizenship. For various reasons we never did it, but now the time has passed – it is just too difficult, queueing at the Croydon office being just a small part of the problem. Britain, once uniquely open-minded and well-informed about the people and politics of foreign countries, is perceived to be suspicious and sometimes even hostile to foreigners, taking its cue from the right-wing Tories, “cabin’d, cribbed, confined, bound in by saucy doubts and fears”.
Of course you’re right. This is a very cruel way of reducing immigration. The fact is, if students are excluded from the net migration figures, net migration is only 167 000 a year. (https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2016/oct/29/foreign-students-key-to-british-economic-and-intellectual-life.) Of course it could be reduced further to satisfy popular demand. But the fact is, immigration isn’t out of control. Measures like this only tarnish Britain’s reputation as a business friendly country- a reputation that we cannot afford to lose given the country’s likely exit from the Single Market.