Potentially good news about feeding the world: vertical farms

There are more than seven billion humans on the Earth, and to feed them we’ve taken 40% of the planet’s total land mass and turned it into cornfields to produce feed for beef cattle. Unfortunately, the world population is expected to grow to 9.6 billion by 2050, and possibly 11 billion by the end of the century. We are going to have to increase our food production by 70% by mid-century. The problem is that most of the land we can work for food is already being cultivated. The only potential farmland left would require slashing and burning the world’s remaining rain forests. This implies big changes to how we farm. But help is at hand.

Spanish greenhouses in the Tabernas Desert already produce a big proportion of fresh vegetables eaten in Europe. The greenhouses now cover 50,000 acres, adding $1.5bn annually to the economy of the province of Almeria. Fruits and vegetables grown indoors tend to have far greater yields per area than comparable produce grown outside. Problems caused by weeds, pests and inclement weather vanish. Add technology such as hydroponics – growing plants so the roots sit in a customised nutrient slurry rather than plain old dirt – to the equation, and yields increase even more. Better yet, build a hydroponic rig that is modular, rotates and stacks: this means you can have several “storeys” of produce growing on the same spot, assuming the stacks all get sufficient light, and you can keep pests and diseases away.

The Fukushima disaster, which wiped out huge areas of farmland, spurred the development of vertical farms in an effort to replace the lost land. Now Japan has hundreds of them – greenhouses stacked high into multistorey skyscrapers where plants rotate daily to catch sunlight. Instead of growing in soil, the plants grow with roots exposed, soaking in nutrients from enriched water or mist. The root systems grow much longer because they have to increase their surface area to absorb the same amount of nutrients. That, in turn, makes the plants grow much faster. Singapore, Sweden, South Korea, Canada, China and the Netherlands also now boast skyscraper farms similar to Japan’s. But with vertical farms light remains a problem; the towers need to be narrow enough to let sunlight penetrate all the way through, or else builders must figure out a way to rotate the growing plants to make sure they all catch enough sunlight.

Or, perhaps, sunlight can be replaced by artificial sources of light energy, such as light-emitting diodes. “Pinkhouses”, as they’re sometimes called, are lit blue and red: those are the spectrums of visible light best absorbed by plants. By using these colours alone, pinkhouses are efficient. In the wild, plants use at most 8% of the light they absorb, while in pinkhouses, the plants can use as much as 15%. In addition, because everything happens indoors, the lights, temperature and humidity can be controlled better than in the most high-tech, sun-dependent vertical farms and greenhouses. As a result, the plants grown in these pinkhouses grow 20% faster than their outdoor cousins, and need 91% less water, negligible fertiliser and no treatment with herbicides or pesticides. (a precis of an article in Newsweek, 2015)

What the produce tastes like is another matter. But then beggars can’t be choosers. It seems that we are already consuming vegetables grown hydroponically in greenhouses, and only a few (such as this writer) have noticed the difference. At least there is food available, economically grown.

2 Comments

  1. I’m all in favour of vertical farming, its yet another example of technology helping us.
    On the other hand, population growth may be so severe, vertical farming may not be enough. Maybe something more extreme is needed: making countries agree to attempt to reduce their birth rates. We already do this with carbon emissions, why not with population control? Governments can do a lot to help: educate their women, provide birth control, impose taxes, liberalise abortion, etc… Its completely reasonable to expect countries with birth rates above 3, to make concerted efforts to reduce them. To an extent, this will mean combating religious extremism; groups like Orthodox Jews that have too many children should be forced to settle down.

    • Ah, reduce the birthrate! The great un-discussed matter on the planet. It is “verboten” because the religious people get after you because they want a big following, and the corporations get after you because they want more consumers. You’d think it was a no-brainer, but any number of people will get angry with you and tell you that the number of people to feed is not an issue and 11 billion is quite o.k. I predict that this will be the next global warming-type thing. They deny the matter now, but by mid-century it (that is, population “restraint”) will be all the rage. Send me a message to heaven when you get to mid-century and tell me it isn’t so! You’ll be alive, I won’t.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.