Plastic bags and sealife

Plastic bags and flexible packaging are the deadliest plastic items in the ocean, killing wildlife around the globe.  Discarded fishing line and nets, as well as latex gloves and balloons were also found to be disproportionately lethal.  Ingesting plastic was responsible for killing animals across 80 species..

The review, published in the journal Conservation Letters, analysed 655scientific articles about marine debris and found 79 studies across all inhabited continents detailing deaths of whales and dolphins, seals and sea lions, sea turtles and sea birds.  (CSIRO, Australian government science agency)

My comment: it would be interesting to know how this detritus gets into the sea in the first place.  Cruise ships come to mind as the worst offenders.  An analysis in 2021 , when cruise ships are laid up, might give an indication by showing whether ocean rubbish has grown or diminished during Covid-19.

An afterlife?

There is no afterlife, no throne in the sky, no choirs or angels.  But the afterlife that is a reality is also reassuring.  As collections of atoms your body is re-cycled into Nature, where parts are re-incorporated into birds, fishes, trees or flowers.  You are immortal!  But in an ever-changing way.  The process can take many decades or centuries, but is assured.  Your reputation may be world-wide or your life may be obscure, but in Nature we are all equal and our corporeal bodies, including our souls, will become part of the glory that is the natural world.

My comment:  Beats doing nothing on a cloud, just listening  to the same hymns to glory every day for eternity.

A touching story

When a TSA officer at Portland International Airport was called over to translate for a Spanish-speaking family, he learned that they had been stuck in the airport overnight. The family had intended to travel to Portland, Maine, but a travel agent booked them a flight to Portland, Ore.

Officer Martin Rios escorted the family to the ticketing desk and found that they had just $200, not enough to fly across the country. Rios paid for the tickets out of his own pocket and sent the family on their way. “I just know that I didn’t really have it in me to turn them away,” he said.

  No comment needed.

What is the point of Facebook?

When it was started Facebook served a useful social service in allowing families and friends to keep up with the people dear to them.  So far so good.  We all know people for whom Facebook is an important part of their lives.  These people far outnumber the wreckers, trouble-makers, haters and liars.

Recently, however,  Facebook and other “social” networks have been adopted by the latter, spreading baseless lies without a shred of evidence and undermining social cohesion and democracy.

The problem is that those baseless lies are uncritically believed by millions (12 million to be fairly precise) who don’t require anything to be true, just that the content suits their skewed world outlook. Result:  the violent insurrection at the U.S. Capitol, which finally moved Facebook to ban the most egregious of liars for disinformation, abuse, and hate speech.

Facebook has created a new Oversight Board, accountable only to Mark Zuckerberg, not the public, that will review decisions on who to ban and for how long. That means that Facebook will still be unaccountable to the public.  It already has rules against sharing inaccurate voting information, spreading election disinformation, and incitement to violence  — it needs to enforce them, reverse the policy of not fact-checking political ads, and immediately close the loopholes that far-right militias exploited to organize  insurrection on Facebook in plain sight.

If Facebook doesn’t listen to the law- abiding and sane and start enforcing its own civic integrity policies, it will need government  action to  protect our democracy and hold them accountable.

My own view, for what it’s worth, is that Facebook et al does more harm than good in any case (see stories about unhappy teenagers), and ought never have been invented, along with other socially undermining things on the internet. But then I suppose I do believe in free speech.  I was just to naive to believe that it couldn’t do so much harm.