Update on the EU and the post-Brexit 1 UK

Far from finally turning the page on five long years of Brexit acrimony, the European parliament’s overwhelming vote to approve the EU-UK trade and cooperation agreement is set to open a whole new chapter of potential disputes.

Commission president Ursula von der Leyen referred pointedly to the “possibility for unilateral remedial measures” in the agreement, going out of her way to say it would “only ever be as good as its implementation and enforcement in practice.”

And that looks likely to be bumpy at best. British delays to Northern Ireland border checks have further eroded EU faith in the UK’s intentions – which, many in the bloc now fear, boil down to trying to ignore as much of what it has signed up to as possible.

There is already trouble looming over fishing rights. Clément Beaune, France’s Europe minister, warned this week that Paris will block City access to EU markets if Britain does not swiftly grant French boats licences to fish in British waters.

“As long as the agreement is not implemented, in full, we will take retaliatory measures in other sectors if necessary,” Beaune said. “The UK must respect its commitments – otherwise we will be as brutal and difficult as necessary.”

As Manfred Weber, leader of the parliament’s largest political bloc, put it bluntly: “We do not trust Boris Johnson’s government.” Ça promet, as they say in France: it all looks very promising. Anyone hoping for the end of Brexit is likely to be disappointed.

Meanwhile, in another sign of turbulent times ahead in EU politics, polls in Germany have the Greens ahead – sometimes comfortably – of Angela Merkel’s conservatives. After 15 years of stability in the EU’s powerhouse, that would shake things up.    (Jon Henley,  Europe correspondent, The Guardian).

My comment:  All this was totally foreseeable, made worse by Brexiteers who are, to be kind, delusional, and  a Prime Minister who thinks everything is a great joke at best and too complicated to get his mind round the boring detail on a daily basis.

I am not a nationalist ( Epicurus would have thought nationalism puzzling) but I feel deeply sad to  see such dire incompetence and the impending decline of England of what used to be a vibrant, creative country.

.

So much for fighting global climate change!

The world’s 60 largest banks have provided $3.8tn of financing for fossil fuel companies since the Paris climate agreement in 2015, a coalition of NGOs have said. While the coronavirus pandemic has triggered a drop in energy use, funding is still net rising.

US and Canadian banks comprise 13 of the 60 banks analysed but account for almost half of global fossil fuel financing over the last five years. Of the 60 banks, 17 have made a commitment to being net zero by 2050, but the NGOs say this must be backed up with meaningful action. Mark Campanale, of the financial thinktank Carbon Tracker, said: “Banks provide the financial oxygen that allows the fossil fuel industry to breathe”. (Guardian 24 mar 2021).

My comment:  You would think that the banks would be hurriedly investing in climate- friendly technologies that they could dominate and thus continue making lashings of cash. Apparently not.  I believe BP and Shell, for instance, have seen the light, but not the American and Canadian oil companies , who are still busy drilling. Denial of science and suspicion of scientists seems to be more common than I thought.

Migrating to an empty continent?

This is the perspective of a native American:

“Recently, Rick Santorum repeated a widely held myth of US exceptionalism. “We came here and created a blank slate, we birthed a nation from nothing,” the former US senator and CNN commentator told the rightwing Young America’s Foundation’s summit. “It was born of the people who came here.” His “we” excludes Indigenous people who were already here or African people who were brought in chains. And that “blank slate” required the violent pillaging of two continents – Africa and North America. If the United States was “birthed from nothing”, then the land and enslaved labor that made the wealth of this nation must have fallen from the sky – because it surely didn’t come from Europe.

“Racist depictions of Indigenous people in the media (CNN is a major offender) points to a deeper issue. The erasure of Native histories and peoples – which existed long before and despite a white supremacist empire – is a founding principle of the United States. In fact, it’s still codified in US law. So when Rick Santorum and his ilk stress that Europeans possess a divine right to take a continent, create a nation from “nothing”, and maintain cultural superiority, they’re not entirely wrong. It’s the default position with a long history.

“And maybe Santorum and his kind are right when they position the US as a Christian theocratic nation. After all, the founding principles of land theft, enslavement and dispossession stem from religious justifications. A 1493 papal decree known as the doctrine of discovery, justified the Christian European conquest of Africa, Asia, Oceania and the Americas. As secretary of state in 1792, Thomas Jefferson declared the doctrine, implemented by European states, was international law and thus applied to the nascent United States as well.

“Those views later inspired the Monroe doctrine, the assertion of US supremacy over the western hemisphere, and manifest destiny, the ideological justification of US westward expansion and colonization. An 1823 US supreme court case, Johnson v Mcintosh, upheld the doctrine, privileging European nations, and successors like the United States, title via “discovery” over Indigenous lands. Indigenous nations and sovereignty, the court ruled, “were necessarily diminished”.

“Such a legal and political reality for Indigenous people is so taken for granted that it is rarely mentioned in history books let alone mainstream commentary. Instead, a culture of amnesia permeates the United States. But purposeful forgetting can’t erase intent, it only perpetuates injury. Erasure makes the taking of Indigenous land easier.

“Although the United States quickly accuses other nations of genocide, it hasn’t acknowledged its own genocide against Indigenous people. To affirm it would mean to take measures to prevent it from happening again. That would mean halting ongoing theft and destruction of Indigenous lands, cultures and nations. A process of justice would have to follow suit. An entire legal order that underpins the backwards racist views and practices towards Indigenous people would have to be overturned. Indigenous land and political rights would have to be restored. A savage nation built of untold violence would have to be finally civilized and make amends with the people and nations it has attempted to destroy. After all the elimination of Indigenous nations was not only about taking the land, it was also about destroying an alternative – a world based on making and being in good relations versus that of a racialized class system based on property and conquest.

“That world still exists, and its stories still need to be told by Indigenous people.

“That’s a tall order that takes willpower, courage, and truth-telling we simply don’t see emanating from corporate newsrooms like CNN, to say nothing of political and ruling elite in this country. Firing Rick Santorum won’t solve these deep-seated inequalities and anti-Indigenous racism. But Indigenous genocide denial – the ultimate cancel culture – should have no platform if we are to finally transcend the 15th century racialist views codified in the doctrine of discovery.”

(Nick Estes is a citizen of the Lower Brule Sioux Tribe and an assistant professor in the American studies department at the University of New Mexico.  Pub. in The Guardian)

My comment, If you have never visited, say, Nevada, and seen the way that the original inhabitants of the Continent are existing ( or scraping a perilous living), then do so.  It is upsetting, to say the least.

Question of the day

Why do we leave cars worth thousands of dollars in our driveways and put our useless junk in the garage?

My comment:  A leading sociologist explained to me that usually there is too much junk in the garage, and  you can’t open the car door sufficiently to squeeze into the driver’s seat.  Why didn’t I think of that?

“Read Epicurus” – a poem

They peddle fear here.

They peddle fear of terrorists and sudden death

They peddle fear of rapists and angry drivers

They peddle fear of government and paying tax

Of deer ticks, butter, sugar, fat, untested drugs;

Of unknown visitors and dark-skinned men,

Of invasion, war and sudden death,

Of gunmen holding up cashiers,

Of bombs in culverts, school kids murdered with guns.

They peddle inquietudes, nervousness, distrust,

And to the terrified, apprehensive, cowed,

They preach damnation, hellfire in the afterlife.

The more they frighten us the more it gains the vote,

And the opinion-makers drivel on in biased turpitude,

Yapping in support of party, church and power.

Command, empire, sway, rule, dominion, supremacy

All depend on mongering fear and bald mendacity.

 

But then there is Epicurus,

His character assassinated by the church,

Maligned, misrepresented, damned by rote.

He only sought a tranquil mind, a life of peace,

Fearing nothing.  For fear, he said, brings pain.

And politics?  Striving, ambition, restlessness.

There are no active gods, said he, no afterlife,

No spirit out there, evil or benign,

Rewarding, punishing, damning you to hell,

No trumpets, choirs, or seats of the almighty.

Just atoms, molecules, and, in them, everlasting life.

No devils, angels, harps, or golden cities;

No god resembling, oh!, coincidence! a man!

No omniscient god who reads your thoughts,

Or manages the minutiae of your life.

Your life, indeed! Your life it is, subject to fortune,

Tribulations, ups and downs, but in the end just yours.

 

Try not to chafe and fret, but seek a mental peace.

Pursue the arts, activities you love.

Don’t worry over things you can’t affect.

Seek simple pleasures, food and friends.

Forsake consumerism, shops and malls,

Buying only what you really need.

Do no harm. Mend fences where required.

Cultivate  your garden and your peace,

Or get a dog.

All to be done in moderation and with joie de vivre,

 

For simple pleasures trump all wild excess.

Be fun, be smiling, for life is to be lived – 

What follows lasts a long, long time,

Should some abuse you as an atheist,

Remember! it is a propaganda word, and just a word,

Spoken by people with their own agenda

Read Epicurus! Till your garden, walk your dog,

Enjoy Nature while we have it still.

Reject all superstition, think for yourself

Believe not the religious memes of modern life.

Be gentle, thoughtful and and ask yourself…

Why do they peddle fear here?

(Robert Hanrott, January 2006)

My current comment:  “Plus ca change!”