Greece, land of Epicurus. Part 1

In Turkey Kemal Ataturk modernised the country when the Ottoman empire fell. The Greeks, who were ruled by the Ottomans for centuries, never had such a leader. Like the Ottomans they have had bloated bureaucracies and endemic corruption since liberation (we are talking Lord Byron here!). Under the empire you avoided paying tax to the oppressor if you could, and many continue this ancient local custom. Greece was accepted into the EU owing to rigged statistics prepared by a very large bank, whose fees for doing so must have been, shall we say, large. That Greece was ever accepted into the EU was down to a starry-eyed idea of Greece being the mother of democracy – two thousand, three hundred years ago. Numerous barbarian invasions later, Greek thought has survived, but democracy long ago flickered and died with the desire for a Greek empire and a stupid war in Sicily. Add time, Alexander the Great and the Romans and democracy was history.

Meanwhile, the whole idea of the Euro was never viable, and most economists knew it at the time. It was a political decision. In an economic area such as the EU, with large, industrial economies like Germany, small countries like Greece and Portugal, dependent on tourism and with little industry, were always going to suffer under an overvalued exchange rate, without being able to devalue to make their economies viable.

What is actually happening here is that countries other than that of Germany have been doing rather badly since the introduction of the euro. Finland and Italy are two obvious examples (stagnation rules). In Spain and Portugal it has been a disaster. The idea of a united Europe is attractive (I support it myself), but once you strip out the desire for unity and no war and you take a hard look at the economics, this is what you see:

Germany makes huge profits from exports. This national surplus is fed through the German banks to banks as loans to, say, Greece. They do so so that Greeks can buy more German goods. When the Greeks can’t repay the loans because they have no exports to speak of, and puny surpluses, if any, the system descends on them like a ton of bricks. This German system will do the same thing to any country that cannot pay for its loans and its German imports. The fact that Germans banks lent out of self-interest and are therefore implicated in the debacle as much as the Greeks is irrelevant to the neo-liberals in charge.

Years ago this used to be called “colonialism”.

Because this post is already a bit long, I will return to suggest an answer tomorrow.

Cementing German domination – hand in hand with Russia

A bit long, but interesting. No, this post is not about the euro and Greece (although I will post about that tomorrow). It is about a little-advertised economic coup, which is important.

Apparently, Gazprom is putting the finishing touches on a massive deal that would double the amount of Russian gas flowing to Germany via a second Nord Stream pipeline, a deal big enough to change the geopolitical calculus of the entire region. 

Once this pipeline is finished, almost all of Eastern Europe will be irrelevant to Russia in terms of gas distribution. There will be no need for any gas to transit through Ukraine, Poland, Romania, Belarus, or Hungary. With Russia’s help, Germany will become the energy hub of Europe. Increasing quantities of Russian gas will be distributed by Germany to countries like the Netherlands, Belgium, France and Britain. In this way Germany will leverage the power of Russia, but also cement the domination sought since the days of Kaiser Wilhelm. Western Europe will become dependent on Germany for gas supplies.

As far as Germany is concerned, the Ukraine crisis is a sideshow. It seems that, despite appearances, Germany and Russia have a recent history of secret cooperation and that the current sanctions against Russia are being quietly ignored by Germany. (Source: Gazprom’s Dangerous New Nord Stream Gas Pipeline to Germany, Robert Morley, The Trumpet). Mrs. Merkel may look harmless and grand-motherly, but she rules in the tradition of Bismark.

Meanwhile, according to  OilPrice.com, Putin has conceived a second whammy:

“Russia’s state-run gas company Gazprom says it has taken a step toward building the Turkish Stream pipeline by securing permission from Ankara to begin surveying waters of the Black Sea for the offshore leg of the project. Alexander Novak, Russia’s energy minister, says he expects Ankara and Moscow will sign an agreement to build Turkish Stream by the end of June.” (Controversial Gazprom Pipeline Clears Hurdle, Oil Price)

Ah, the historic Russian push towards the Mediterranean and the Middle East. Who says history never repeats itself? We live in interesting times.

Following the news

“My engagement with the news, like a lot of people’s, is on the whole a mess. Occasionally a spike of true connection will come through, but those moments tend to lead nowhere. Maybe a charitable donation. Maybe a mini speech to someone I know (subtext: I really care about this, do you?). Maybe, once in a decade, I will go on a march or write a letter. But usually not. When I don’t follow the news, it feels liberating to let all that go. But does that freedom come at a cost? Does it matter that I don’t know what is happening in Syria? I can’t believe it doesn’t. Even if I am powerless to do anything, I feel that the guilt itself is important. That it’s the debt we owe the world, to feel bad about it.”
Jesse Armstrong, The Guardian. May 2015

Part of the reason why I started this blog was to keep up with world affairs, to keep my brain active and to work out what I thought about the issues of the day. A noble set of objectives, even if, as the lady says, we are all totally powerless to change a thing. It’s impossible to do sufficient justice to it all. As a result I feel woefully ignorant, my brain is only just chugging along, and I’m not sure what I think about anything anymore. As a result, I am extremely easily influenced, so if you have any views at all, please write in.

Are you getting sick of feed-back requests?

You can’t go to a shop, art gallery, restaurant or hospital without being handed a form and asked to rate your “experience” on an idiotic “strongly agree/strongly disagree” scale. Businesses never used to pester us this way: they would work out if they were doing a good job by – “radical concept, this” – talking to customers, and observing their habits. Small businesses such as family-run restaurants and newsagents still do so. But not “Corporate Britain”. Big firms depend on feedback data because their managers never come into contact with customers and won’t delegate proper decision-making power to frontline staff who do. An encounter with the person in the shop increasingly feels as if it’s the two of you versus “a hidden global corporation that takes the profits but isn’t actually there”. Here’s my tip to business. Throw away the Q&A forms and just devote more energy to providing a better service in the first place. (Mark Mason, The Spectator)

You cannot be an effective manager unless you have a clear idea how you stand with your customers, snd this requires actually talking to them, not hiding behind telephonists and junior, semi-trained staff. I entirely agree with Mr. Mason. The bigger the company, the more insensitively they behave. British Telecom kept me waiting on the phone the other day for 18 minutes. When I finally got through to Bangalore the technical service woman had no idea how to answer my query (why should she on 5 dollars a day?). After all this time waiting I had actually found the bit on the BT website that answered my query (total fluke). So I read it out to her. Thank you, she said. It was her training for the day. In return I gave the company zero on every aspect of service. Waste of time, of course.