Ithaca

As you set out for Ithaka
hope your road is a long one,
full of adventure, full of discovery.
Laistrygonians, Cyclops,
angry Poseidon—don’t be afraid of them:
you’ll never find things like that on your way
as long as you keep your thoughts raised high,
as long as a rare excitement
stirs your spirit and your body.
Laistrygonians, Cyclops,
wild Poseidon—you won’t encounter them
unless you bring them along inside your soul,
unless your soul sets them up in front of you.

Hope your road is a long one.
May there be many summer mornings when,
with what pleasure, what joy,
you enter harbors you’re seeing for the first time;
may you stop at Phoenician trading stations
to buy fine things,
mother of pearl and coral, amber and ebony,
sensual perfume of every kind—
as many sensual perfumes as you can;
and may you visit many Egyptian cities
to learn and go on learning from their scholars.

Keep Ithaka always in your mind.
Arriving there is what you’re destined for.
But don’t hurry the journey at all.
Better if it lasts for years,
so you’re old by the time you reach the island,
wealthy with all you’ve gained on the way,
not expecting Ithaka to make you rich.

Ithaka gave you the marvelous journey.
Without her you wouldn’t have set out.
She has nothing left to give you now.

And if you find her poor, Ithaka won’t have fooled you.
Wise as you will have become, so full of experience,
you’ll have understood by then what these Ithakas mean.

(C. P. Cavafy, “The City” from C.P. Cavafy: Collected Poems. Translated by Edmund Keeley and Philip Sherrard. Translation Copyright © 1975, 1992 by Edmund Keeley and Philip Sherrard. Reproduced with permission of Princeton University Press.) Source: C.P. Cavafy: Collected Poems (Princeton University Press, 1975)

Hope, expectation, objectives in life, enjoying life’s journey.  Cafafy was Greek, like Epicurus.  Epicurus would nod and totally agree with the sentiments of this wonderful poem.  Unfortunately, all too many people have nothing in their lives, no dreams, no objectives , nothing fulfilling that offers the excitement of a consuming activity.  They have no journey, no vivid experiences, no passing triumphs or even tragedies .  Nor do they have anything pleasurable, no Ithika,  to look back on.  Would that all the aggrieved and unhappy people in the world could have an objective that  excites them.

Epicurus and Judaism

Yet another of my modern philosophy posts. This completes my take on the three main monotheisms. You can read my views on Islam here http://hanrott.com/blog/epicurus-and-islam/, and on Christianity here http://hanrott.com/blog/epicurus-and-christianity/. 

Out of the three Abrahamic monotheisms, Judaism is perhaps the most unique. Unlike Christianity and Islam, it does not aspire to convert large portions of the world to its beliefs. As a result, the Jewish people are an ethnoreligious group. Due to its small size, Judaism has never established a continental sphere of influence, the way Christianity did in Europe or Islam did in the Middle East and North Africa. Moreover, Jews have been subject to extreme discrimination throughout history, unlike Christians and Muslims who have only suffered discrimination periodically. There has been no equivalent for the Holocaust for Christians or Muslims. This is despite Judaism being by far the least threatening of the these three religions.

Theologically speaking, my critiques of Christianity and Islam also apply to Judaism. The notion of submission to a divine being whose nature we cannot discover except for by reading ancient texts is one I find troubling. Like Christianity and Islam, Judaism generally promotes social conservatism, though its liberal denominations are more prominent than either of the other two. But because Jews don’t proselytise, I don’t view Judaism as a threat to liberal values or secular government the way the conservative branches of Christianity and Islam are. For the most part, Jews simply want to be free to practice their religion, which is a fundamental right for everyone.

Having said that, in Israel, the rapid growth of Haredi Judaism is a concern. The Haredi do not integrate with wider Israeli society, preferring to live on their own. They have very low labour force participation rates, often preferring to study the Torah- putting pressure on Israel’s generous welfare state. They are largely exempt from national service, which is resented by secular Israelis who understandably believe that if the Haredi benefit from a secure Israel, they should contribute to it. They also have exceptionally high birth rates, which not only puts pressure on housing in a densely populated country, but it will make Israeli culture more conservative in the future. Wider Orthodox Judaism doesn’t necessarily have these issues. But the Orthodox do tend to vote for some right wing parties, who may make peace with the Palestinians less likely.

The tendency for the more religious Jews to have more children is a worldwide trend, not just in Israel. As a result, global Judaism and Jewish identity will be considerably more socially conservative and distinct. As the West grows more liberal and secular, Jews living outside Israel will become more conspicuous. Religious Jews outside Israel may feel alienated from a wider society that does not share their values. If they stay in their home country, they may be unhappy and feel like non-Jews don’t understand them. If they move to Israel, they will add to the country’s increasing conservatism. The size of Jewish settlements in the West Bank and East Jerusalem will have to grow, much to the frustration of the Palestinians and the international community. Outside Israel, the increasing religiosity of the world’s Jews may cause anti-Semitic discrimination to rise. The far right may see a culturally distinct Jewish minority as a threat to the nation’s character, in a similar fashion to their view of Islam now. The far left may be suspicious of the fact that most religious Jews are pro-Israel and tend to vote for conservative parties- orthodox Jews in America are overwhelmingly Republican.

Overall I’m hopeful for the future of Judaism and I wish the world’s Jews the best of luck. Unlike Netanyahu, I don’t believe that Europe is irredeemably anti-Semitic. For the most part, the West will continue to welcome the cultural and economic contributions of its Jewish community. The West will also continue to engage with Israel, not isolating itself from them. But there are significant challenges ahead. Israel’s population, economy and global influence will continue to rise, which will enrage much of the Arab world and the European far left. The need for a peaceful solution to the Arab-Israeli conflict will become more urgent. As Jews living in the West become more distinct, it’s important we teach the next generation tolerance and understanding. Provided we can overcome these challenges, the future of the world’s Jews is very bright. They make a disproportionate contribution to the arts, science, industry and technology, and will almost certainly continue to do so.

 

Best of the Week #13 The unwinnable war

Trump won the 2016 Republican Primary for a myriad of reasons, some of which I’ve looked at here http://hanrott.com/blog/how-the-republicans-should-respond-to-trump/. But a crucial factor was the fact that he distinguished himself from other Republicans. Partly through his straight-talking manner. Partly through his support for entitlements, in contrast to a Republican establishment that wants to reduce them. Partly due to his opposition to free trade. But the most significant different between Trump and the his opponents was that Trump presented himself as a realist in regards to foreign policy. He eviscerated the other candidates for their support for the Iraq War, Jeb Bush especially. He wasn’t a non-interventionist per se, promising to ‘bomb the shit out of ISIS.’ But he vowed to put the national interest first, not spend billions of American dollars on fruitless foreign adventures.

It’s long been obvious that the war in Afghanistan can’t be won, simply because as soon as America withdraws, there’s nothing to guarantee the country won’t be taken over by the Taliban because they enjoy protection in Pakistan. Laurel Miller, who was until recently America’s leading diplomat in Afghanistan and Pakistan, agrees. Her explanation can be read in this excellent interview with Vox’s Sean Illing https://www.vox.com/world/2017/8/1/16049272/afghanistan-war-donald-trump-mattis-military. Yet Trump has backtracked on his past support for a realist foreign policy. As Miller points out, his new Afghanistan policy is little different from the neoconservatism/liberal internationalism that has defined America’s approach since the war started in 2001.

Trump’s u-turn on Afghanistan is yet another example of how his presidency is a complete failure, even on his own terms. The typical Trump voter wanted: proper job security, a substantial increase in the number of manufacturing and energy jobs, the repeal of Obamacare with ‘something ‘fantastic’, an America-first foreign policy and a considerable reduction in immigration. So far, none of those things have happened, or even are likely to happen between now and 2020. So what was the point in voting for Trump? Perhaps only the certainty that a Hillary Clinton presidency would be a continuation of the status quo. If neither Trump nor Hillary Clinton were serious about reforming a badly divided and indebted country, then American politics is truly broken.

 

Mass overstaying of study visas exploded as myth

While Theresa May was Home Secretary the Home office put out a statistic that claimed that 100,000 foreign students a year stayed on illegally after their visas expired.  This “fact” was used by the Brexiteers in their campaign as proof of uncontrolled immigration. But new data from the Office of National Statistics says there were only 4,600 last year. proving that foreign students constitute a much smaller risk of overstaying their visas than the government has contended.  “We spent five years trying to persuade the Home Office that the figures they were using as evidence were bogus,” said the Lib Dem leader, Vince Cable, who was part of the coalition under David Cameron. “But they persisted nonetheless on the basis of these phoney numbers.”

The data from the ONS also shows net migration has fallen to its lowest level for three years, partly driven by a “Brexodus” of EU workers. Departure of EU citizens increased by 33,000 year on year to 122,000 – the highest outflow for nearly a decade. The latest yearly migration figure stands at 246,000, which is 81,000 lower than the 327,000 recorded up to March 2016.  (The Guardian, August 25th).

British universities have expanded so much that their business priority is to now recruit as many students as possible, from home and overseas, for economic reasons.  We see the same process in the UK as in the US. –  large sums are spent on dorms, social and sporting facilities to attract students, but teaching quality doesn’t necessarily improve, only the income of the top administrators.  Then anecdotally,  large numbers of , say Chinese, students may improve the economics, but the larger the number the more they socialise together, don’t speak English, and return home none the wiser, except they have probably irritated other students with their clannishness.  Good for the balance of payments, but do these foreign students learn much about Britain, do they learn much at all?  Is their English good?  Is their any point? Mmmmmh.  The bursting of the higher education bubble, long expected, might be nigh.