The idea of Gross National Happiness is so appropriate for Epicureans that I would like to pursue it, criterion by criterion. Leaving aside Bhutan and local cultural variations for a moment, what does it take for the great mass of the world population to enjoy psychological well-being. Not necessarily in order of importance, here are some suggestions:
– You have the basic needs with respect to food shelter and health.
– You have the opportunity to learn, create, and interact socially so that you have a satisfying life.
– A feeling that the country is prospering and is on the right track.
– When you vote politicians take notice and in general respect your wishes
– A settled family-based culture in which young people learn from and are disciplined by adults, and older people are respected for their experience.
– Women are held in high esteem and sexual aggression is severely dealt with
– That there is predictability and observed rules in the way you are treated by the authorities and the management of your work place.
– The justice system is honest and you can count on fair treatment
– The government, having promised a service or benefit will carry it out and not arbitrarily terminate it.
– Where there are grave differences of opinion you can rely on wise leaders to prevent the disagreements ending in violence.
– that moderation, creativity and a cooperative spirit are more highly valued over money and material success.
Has anyone any additions to or quarrels with the above?
Certainly no quarrels at all. Maybe additions after some reflection. Ironically, I thought these were the goods that supposedly were enshrined in the founding documents. Quite disillusioning, in a good way, that Bhutan has updated more recently than we have. Or perhaps I was deluded for a very long time about the realities of history.